Teams

MO/Jones/Tri-level3.0-4.0 Men

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over 3.0-4.0 Tri-Level · 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-11vs Wachob 3.0-4.0 MenWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Xu / Bill Quale vs Austin Propst / Fabian Solano6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJaeBok Moon / Kevin Liljenquist vs Eli Wachob / Nick Hansen2-4, 4-0, 1-0
2025-10-11vs Wachob 3.0-4.0 MenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnthony Jones / Robby Herbert vs Sage Riddle / Jordan Ward4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Liljenquist / JaeBok Moon vs Nick Hansen / Eli Wachob4-1, 4-0
2025-10-08vs Wachob 3.0-4.0 MenWon 10
W#2 DoublesClinton Little / Matthew Murrow vs Austin Propst / Sage Riddle6-4, 6-3
2025-10-08vs Wachob 3.0-4.0 MenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRyan Bell / Blake Jones vs Matthew Best / Jose Gonzalez7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Liljenquist / JaeBok Moon vs Nick Hansen / Eli Wachob4-0, 4-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Robby Herbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anthony Jones
published 4
Bill Quale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Clinton Little
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Ryan Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
JaeBok Moon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
John Xu
published
Kevin Liljenquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Murrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Liljenquist + JaeBok Moon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robby Herbert
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Anthony Jones
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Bill Quale
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Clinton Little
27W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Ryan Bell
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3
JaeBok Moon
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
John Xu
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Liljenquist
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Murrow
34W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Jones
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.