Teams

SD LLW 3.5 Moutain View/ Wunderly

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD · SD - Women - WD 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesJunko Toda / Mina Tsuya vs Diana Meskimen / Kari Ursitti6-2, 6-3
2022-03-17vs SD 3.5 Moutain View/ Louis (3:1)Won 10
W#1 SinglesJunko Toda vs Celina Tiznado6-1, 6-1
2022-03-10vs SD 3.5 SDTRC /Monzon (2:2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Junko Toda vs Kerry Ott / Sandy Dielman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-03vs SD 3.5 Peninsula/ Trent (3:1)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Karen Lackritz vs Patricia HOLMAN / Susan Schraeder6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJunko Toda / Margaret Ann Mansell vs Rachel Bevis / Karen Sahd6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Mie Bennett vs Maria Simon / Christy Ward6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJunko Toda vs Joan Fahrenthold6-0, 6-0
2022-02-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Junko Toda vs Yaz Gomez / Kathy Nichols6-3, 6-1
2022-02-10vs SD 3.5 Moutain View/ Louis (3:1)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Lackritz / Haruko Vajda vs Elizabeth Ponce / Lilyan Ruiz6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJunko Toda vs Ariela Zagursky6-1, 6-0
2022-02-03vs SD 3.5 SDTRC /Monzon (2:2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Karen Lackritz vs Kerry Ott / Ana Mariela Gamiz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-27vs SD 3.5 Peninsula/ Trent (3:1)Won 10
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Karen Lackritz vs Pam Trent / Dianne Randquist6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Karen Lackritz vs Kelli Marovish / Hayley Connors6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJunko Toda vs Michelle Gilmore6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - WD 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Junko Toda
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.60
Julie Wunderly
published 4
3.50
Haruko Vajda
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.43
Herta Ixtlahuac
published 3.5
3.39
Silvia Rodriguez
published
3.23
3.18
Mie Bennett
published
3.03
Kelly Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Wunderly + Junko Toda8456% games−0.7% vs expected
Haruko Vajda + Julie Wunderly5746% gamesnot enough data
Haruko Vajda + Junko Toda8457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Junko Toda
246W–88L career · 8 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Julie Wunderly
60W–58L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Haruko Vajda
165W–125L career · 8 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Herta Ixtlahuac
107W–70L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
Silvia Rodriguez
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Margaret Ann Mansell
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Mie Bennett
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Kelly Morgan
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.