Teams

Agrawal-Alley Cats

2025 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Ying-Chieh Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Shweta Agrawal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.30
Amanda Yaris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2025-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Yaris / Ying-Chieh Chen vs Deborah Chapman / Gretchen Hall6-0, 6-1
2025-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Becker / Amanda Yaris vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Melissa Jacobs6-3, 6-4
2025-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShweta Agrawal / Amanda Yaris vs Laurence Dupray / Josette Zervic6-1, 6-4
2025-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesYing-Chieh Chen / Amanda Yaris vs Tina Prassas / Kate Elliott6-3, 7-5
2025-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Becker / Ying-Chieh Chen vs Teufelin Traylen / Tiffany Bowie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYing-Chieh Chen / Mai-Anh Nguyen vs Ginny Nguyen / Allison Ko4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShweta Agrawal / Jessica Becker vs Karen Harlow / Jing Li7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Ying-Chieh Chen
45W–15L career
0%88%12%
3.44
3
Shweta Agrawal
94W–36L career
0%2%98%
3.35
3.5
Amanda Yaris
45W–21L career
0%99%1%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.