← Teams

MAC-Mangan

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Christin Harrington
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Emma Scherzer
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
2.75
Anne Mangan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results17 ties
2022-10-02Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Zachary Wright vs Gregory Snow / Jill Snow3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-01Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Zachary Wright vs Roger van Houten / Christy Granard6-4, 6-3
2022-08-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Holly Lekas vs Amy Karau / Lesley Brown6-4, 7-5
2022-08-26Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Mallica Sikka4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Lekas / Anne Mangan vs Vera Choi / Linda Benenato6-3, 6-1
2022-08-26Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesNancy Yen Shipley / Christin Harrington vs Carli Weckerly / Milla Woller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Angela Winter vs Denise Visse / Karla Hendrickson6-1, 6-2
2022-08-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChristin Harrington / Nancy Yen Shipley vs Min Jin Lee / Jenna Caggiano7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Milenka Coltman vs Liliana Cardenas / Maileen Walz3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Suzanne Puttman vs Katie van Zyl / Mary Jean Waite6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmma Scherzer vs Jia Cui4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristin Harrington / Marcy Patton vs Amy Wang / Xiaoyi Ye6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-12Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Suzanne Puttman vs Dana Lybeck / Erika Mullins6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmma Scherzer vs Jennifer Terami6-4, 6-0
2022-06-18Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Holly Lekas vs Erin Dineen / Abigail Cupper6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Emily Harrington6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-12Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Nancy Yen Shipley vs Noelle Hamilton / Missy Kim0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Geri Marcus6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Milenka Coltman vs Susan Brookfield / Stephanie Pelton6-1, 6-0
2022-03-05Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Milenka Coltman vs Natalie Mesnier / Margo Yohner6-4, 7-5
2022-02-27Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Karen Lutz6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMilenka Coltman / Anne Mangan vs Carmen Timberlake / Carli Weckerly6-2, 6-1
2022-02-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Anna Ringelberg vs Cheri Mosbrucker / Brenda Strombo6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Yen Shipley / Christin Harrington vs Marina Strous / Roxanna Johnson6-2, 6-0
2022-02-05Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Suzanne Puttman vs Lee Gates / Debora Cox6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Schubert / Emma Scherzer vs Xiaobo Dai / Sheila Amarga-Lee6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-01-29Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Milenka Coltman vs Heather Dale / Candice Smith6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmma Scherzer vs Heather Davidson6-0, 6-0
2022-01-23Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesChristin Harrington / Emma Scherzer vs Jaime Venezia / Jee Shin6-3, 6-0
2022-01-14Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Milenka Coltman vs Andrea Cedfeldt / Sima Desai6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmma Scherzer / Sarah Schubert vs Cory Sebastian / Susan Grabe6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christin Harrington
81W–35L career
0%65%35%
3.56
3.5
Emma Scherzer
21W–6L career
not enough data
—
3
Anne Mangan
62W–74L career
6%91%4%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.