Teams

Williams Y - MulveMele

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-10vs San Jose - CumbowLost 23
L#1 DoublesLouis Posick / Mark Cabler vs Roli Selfors / William Langley6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Stephen vs Ryan Rafferty2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGary Gray / David Drill vs Kenneth Brannon / Richard Scott7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMike Mulvey / David Weinand vs Derek Kettel / Johnthomas Cumbow6-0, 6-0
L#4 DoublesRon Todaro / Stephen Chapman vs Phillip Garcia / Michael Siebenhaar1-6, 0-6
2025-03-01vs Oakleaf - ChauLost 04
L#1 SinglesDavid Weinand vs Thomas Chau3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Mele / Mark Cabler vs Ritchie Cachin / Michael Corpuz1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Ryan / David Drill vs Chris Yoerges / Rommel Marson0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesRaymond Zenisek / Ron Todaro vs William Hockenbury / Brian Lawrence1-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs Julington Creek - BowmanWon 32
L#1 DoublesRaymond Zenisek / Ron Todaro vs John Taylor / Pedro Enrique Kreitz Martinez1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Stephen vs Amir Moghaddam6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Ryan / Craig Mele vs Christopher Lynch / Hal Markowitz7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Drill / Mark Cabler vs Steve Tripp / Mahesh Hulikere6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesLouis Posick / David Weinand vs Peter Bowman / Douglas Kastleman7-5, 6-1
2025-02-15vs Eagle Harbor - WilliamsLost 13
L#1 DoublesCraig Mele / David Weinand vs Ray Williams / Michael Rouse6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Stephen vs Neal McDaniel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Drill / Gary Gray vs Larry Davidow / Jeffrey Budde0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMark Cabler / Louis Posick vs Christopher Lane / Raja David6-4, 6-4
2025-02-08vs San Jose - CumbowLost 23
W#1 DoublesCraig Mele / David Weinand vs Phillip Garcia / Johnthomas Cumbow6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMike Mulvey vs Ryan Rafferty4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Cabler / Louis Posick vs Kevin Valent / Derek Kettel3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRon Todaro / Thomas Stephen vs Roli Selfors / William Langley4-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesGary Gray / David Drill vs Michael Zambetti / Richard Scott3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Oakleaf - ChauLost 23
L#1 DoublesDavid Weinand / Craig Mele vs VAN LE / Rommel Marson0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMike Mulvey vs Thomas Chau0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Cabler / Louis Posick vs Julian Mansell / Tai Pham6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Drill / Gary Gray vs Ritchie Cachin / Michael Corpuz3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesJohn Ryan / Raymond Zenisek vs William Hockenbury / Brian Lawrence4-6, 2-6
2025-01-30vs FYC - WilliamsLost 04
L#1 DoublesRon Todaro / Raymond Zenisek vs Kenneth Watson / John Williams4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMike Mulvey vs Ryan Chandler7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Cabler / Gary Gray vs Brent Henning / Clark Green3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Mele / David Drill vs Chris Chewning / JD Reeder3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Mike Mulvey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Thomas Stephen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
David Weinand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Craig Mele
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Louis Posick
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
David Drill
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Ron Todaro
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Gary Gray
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Mark Cabler
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Raymond Zenisek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louis Posick + Mark Cabler4347% games+1.2% vs expected
David Drill + Gary Gray224 matchesnot enough data
Craig Mele + David Weinand123 matchesnot enough data
Raymond Zenisek + Ron Todaro033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Mulvey
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Thomas Stephen
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
David Weinand
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Craig Mele
15W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Louis Posick
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
David Drill
5W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Ron Todaro
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Gary Gray
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Mark Cabler
11W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Raymond Zenisek
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.