Teams

Jennings-PVCC

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-27vs Hicks/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsey Wittenberg vs Stefan Jones7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLaura Hum vs Heather Larsen5-7, 6-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Mathews vs Amanda Gray6-0, 6-4
2025-01-19vs Shaddock/LR/LRACWon 21
L#1 SinglesJo Margaret Bennett vs Maeve Shaddock4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLaura Hum vs Aislinn Andrews4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSarah Mathews vs Ashley Burch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-12-12vs Watts/NLR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesLindsey Wittenberg vs Brandi Watts6-3, 3-2
L#2 SinglesJo Margaret Bennett vs Denise Allen-Duff2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKeelen Verser vs Tracy Foster6-4, 6-4
2024-11-23vs Hicks/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesBethany Jennings vs Katie Hicks1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJo Margaret Bennett vs Amanda Gray4-6, 6-5
W#3 SinglesKeelen Verser vs Stefan Jones6-2, 6-4
2024-11-14vs Scott/LR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesLindsey Wittenberg vs Molly Scott6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLindsey Dail vs Alex Richard6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSarah Mathews vs Emily Robinson6-0, 6-4
2024-11-06vs Rabinowitz/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsey Dail vs Bailey Pollock2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey Wittenberg vs Brittany Marsh7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLaura Hum vs Mary Nell McBryde3-6, 4-6
2024-10-29vs Shaddock/LR/LRACLost 12
L#1 SinglesKeelen Verser vs Mary Thalheimer1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Mathews vs Natalie Gorman1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesLindsey Wittenberg vs Aislinn Andrews5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-21vs Watts/NLR/BPWon 21
L#1 SinglesSarah Mathews vs Emily Gates3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey Wittenberg vs Brandi Watts6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLaura Hum vs Holly Taylor7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Sarah Mathews
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.11
Keelen Verser
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Lindsey Wittenberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.73
Jo Margaret Bennett
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.69
Bethany Jennings
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Laura Hum
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Lindsey Dail
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keelen Verser + Sarah Mathews224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Mathews
23W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Keelen Verser
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lindsey Wittenberg
26W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Jo Margaret Bennett
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Bethany Jennings
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Laura Hum
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsey Dail
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.