Teams

S-LJFE-Fernandez/PAC 3.0 Sat

2022 Lake 18 & Over Summer Singles · Men 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-30vs S-LDAndrews/Westport 3.0 SatSplit 11
W#1 SinglesIvan Ruyle vs Justin Wilkes6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDavid Peeler vs James Laurenson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-23vs S-LABogo/CSD 3.0 SatLost 01
L#1 SinglesIvan Ruyle vs Louis Foreman3-6, 0-6
2022-07-16vs S-LJReiner/ NMP Singles 3.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesDavid Peeler vs Gian Sarolli6-1, 6-1
2022-07-11Lost 01
L#2 SinglesIvan Ruyle vs David Andrews6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-25vs S-LJReiner/ NMP Singles 3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesIvan Ruyle vs Bradford Powell6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDavid Peeler vs Neil McLean6-0, 6-2
2022-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesIvan Ruyle vs David Andrews6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-04vs S-LABogo/CSD 3.0 SatWon 10
W#1 SinglesIvan Ruyle vs Timothy Vallejos6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Ivan Ruyle
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.46
Julius Fernandez
published
3.26
Ranjith Rajadurai
published
3.01
Russell Swift
published
2.69
David Peeler
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.58
Adam Feinberg
published 3
Walter Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Swift + Adam Feinberg1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ivan Ruyle
82W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
Julius Fernandez
16W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Ranjith Rajadurai
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Russell Swift
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
David Peeler
44W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Adam Feinberg
4W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
Walter Rodriguez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.