Teams

DCarmazzi (Matthews Tennis Club)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-29vs SWooten (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Cathy Purvis vs Karen Brooks / Susan Adams6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadeleine Glover / Shelley Brunker vs Gwynne Ravenel / Sharon Wooten6-4, 7-6
2022-04-25vs KKing (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRuth di Stefano / Cathy Purvis vs Lisa Gaylord / Lynette Hague6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarsha McCrory / Lizzy Scott vs Amy Nielsen / Karen Schmit1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShelley Brunker / Elizabeth Edwards vs Lori Chriscoe / Janet Baker1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-04vs LSchoeck (Pine Lake)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarsha McCrory / Lizzy Scott vs Julie Smallwood / Susan Anthony6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShelley Brunker / Ruth di Stefano vs Marcella Bunnell / Robin Boyles6-0, 6-3
2022-03-28vs TRhyne (Russell)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLizzy Scott / Linda Miller vs Anne Sadler / Maebeth Hill6-7, 3-6
2022-03-21vs LCunningham (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#2 DoublesAnne Sykes / Shelley Brunker vs Sheila Reitler / Liza Branch6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Butler / Lizzy Scott vs Linda Cunningham / Lina Mazigi6-2, 6-4
2022-03-07vs CHelms (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLizzy Scott / Linda Miller vs Ana Dubois / Lu Ann Burke6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShelley Brunker / Allison Adzema vs Eileen Donohue / Judith Skelton6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-21vs SWooten (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Miller / Lizzy Scott vs Christianne Coover / Jane Royther6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Cathy Purvis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Shelley Brunker
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.69
Debbie Carmazzi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Lizzy Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Carolyn Butler
published 4
3.43
Madeleine Glover
published
3.35
Anne Sykes
published 3.5
3.25
Allison Adzema
published 3.5
Ruth di Stefano
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Purvis
59W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
Shelley Brunker
103W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Debbie Carmazzi
68W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Lizzy Scott
39W–27L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Carolyn Butler
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Madeleine Glover
25W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Anne Sykes
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Allison Adzema
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Ruth di Stefano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.