Teams

FV:FVRC55:Suttmeier

2021 NCT Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesEric Torgersen / Andrew Miller vs Steve Wargat / Khane Moundraty6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Parekh / Larry Hunt vs Daniel Rodriguez / JOSE DEJUAN6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott Paul / David Cappello vs RICHARD OJA / TEJAS SONPAL7-5, 6-4
2021-05-08vs ETC:Merrill/RoebelenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Miller / Eric Torgersen vs George Roebelen / Jorge Messmer6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Parekh / Matthew Dallas Gordon vs Pete Fracasso / Doug Arlow6-1, 3-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesDavid Cappello / Jacob Schreiber vs Greg Plochocki / Steve Wargat1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Suttmeier / Larry Hunt vs Khane Moundraty / JOSE DEJUAN6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesScott Paul / Frederic de Baeck vs Paul Tetreault / RICHARD OJA6-2, 6-4
2021-04-17vs SIMS:Granger/KnoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarlos Badiola / Frederic de Baeck vs Steve Arcand / Stephen Young6-4, 5-7, 5-1
W#2 DoublesAlan Nathan / Larry Hunt vs Kevin Knox / Christopher Bentley4-6, 6-2, 4-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Suttmeier / Matthew Dallas Gordon vs Lawrence Klobutcher / Randy Miller6-2, 6-3
2021-03-27vs SIMS:Granger/KnoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacob Schreiber / Stephen Aronson vs Jim Tillow / Steve Arcand6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLarry Hunt / David Parekh vs Simon Ostrov / Randy Miller6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlan Nathan / James Young vs Akhil Johri / Jack Yeshion6-3, 4-6, 4-2
2021-03-06vs ETC:Merrill/RoebelenWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Miller / Jacob Schreiber vs George Roebelen / Jorge Messmer6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephen Aronson / Melvin Simon vs Jonathan Avery / Doug Arlow6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarlos Badiola / Frederic de Baeck vs David Merrill / Peter Judson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:FVRC55:Suttmeier601539131
2EHTC:String Busters 55+:DeJuan/Plochocki4212613141
3ETC:Merrill/Roebelen2481023180
4SIMS:Granger/Knox0611735226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
David Parekh
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.29
Larry Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Scott Paul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Torgersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Alan Nathan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Carlos Badiola
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Frederic de Baeck
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Melvin Simon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jacob Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
James Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Stephen Aronson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
David Cappello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Matthew Dallas Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Suttmeier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melvin Simon + Alan Nathan101051% games+2.6% vs expected
Stephen Aronson + James Young111051% games+0.7% vs expected
Jacob Schreiber + Melvin Simon13851% games−2.1% vs expected
Stephen Aronson + Frederic de Baeck1937% games−8.0% vs expected
Peter Suttmeier + Eric Torgersen8158% gamesnot enough data
James Young + Alan Nathan4355% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Badiola + James Young5163% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Aronson + Melvin Simon1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Parekh
50W–48L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Larry Hunt
79W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.29
Scott Paul
31W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Eric Torgersen
32W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Alan Nathan
45W–39L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carlos Badiola
67W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Frederic de Baeck
72W–107L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Melvin Simon
67W–61L career · 1 line in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jacob Schreiber
52W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
James Young
39W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
Stephen Aronson
67W–92L career · 2 lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
David Cappello
34W–22L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.71
Matthew Dallas Gordon
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Suttmeier
126W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.