Teams

MLong-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2026-06-23vs YDeaver-DURLost 02
L#2 SinglesStacy Brehm vs Becki Cleveland3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Lula Melton6-7, 0-6
2026-06-18vs JPermutt-CHTCLost 01
L#1 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Andy Blackburn0-6, 1-6
2026-06-16vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 01
L#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Deborah Hertzog1-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesMary T Long vs Jennifer Pyle2-6, 0-6
2026-06-09vs KCabelka-HRWon 10
W#3 SinglesSusan Brogden vs Tracy Shelton6-1, 6-1
2026-06-05vs JPermutt-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Joelle Permutt2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMary T Long vs Cynthia Kleeberger0-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs YDeaver-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSusan Brogden vs Kellianne White3-6, 2-5
W#3 SinglesStacy Brehm vs Edith Becerra2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-26vs KCabelka-HRLost 02
L#2 SinglesStacy Brehm vs Michelle Koeneke1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Tracy Shelton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-24vs JPermutt-CHTCLost 01
L#2 SinglesMary T Long vs Celina Morice1-6, 0-6
2026-05-22vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 02
L#2 SinglesMary T Long vs Donna Spero1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Jennifer Pyle1-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs DBaker-TOCHSplit 11
L#2 SinglesStacy Brehm vs Liz Schaller1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Janet Ranheim6-2, 6-4
2026-05-12vs PDavis-DURWon 20
W#2 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesStacy Brehm vs Jennifer Huggins6-3, 6-0
2026-05-05vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Cecily Peterson0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesStacy Brehm vs Kinsey Wennerstrom0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Susan Brogden
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.82
Stacy Brehm
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.71
Richelle Robinson
usually #3 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Brehm + Mary T Long123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Brogden
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Stacy Brehm
92W–161L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Richelle Robinson
125W–138L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.