Teams

SWAGERTY

2023 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Womens 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-07vs CanadyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Massey / Elizabeth Gardner vs Catherine Morrison / Darlene Satifka2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-30vs CanadyLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathi Swagerty / Laura Holt-Kabel vs Cheryl Canady / Barbara Caropolo3-6, 3-6
2023-09-13vs CanadyLost 01
L#3 DoublesTerri Meier / Elizabeth Gardner vs Veronica Canihan / Darlene Satifka4-6, 6-7
2023-09-06vs CanadySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathi Swagerty / Laura Holt-Kabel vs Carolyn Medley / Kathleen Timberlake7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiz Coughlin / Elizabeth Gardner vs Veronica Canihan / Lisa Sottung3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-16vs CanadyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Massey / Elizabeth Gardner vs Catherine Morrison / Karen Fania1-6, 1-6
2023-08-09vs CanadyWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gardner / Margaret Massey vs Veronica Canihan / Lisa Sottung6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Laura Holt-Kabel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Lynn Gore
published
3.91
Loretta Lestrange
published
3.91
Liz Coughlin
published
3.86
Margaret Massey
published
3.81
Betsy Kahn
published 4
3.73
Elizabeth Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Terri Meier
published
Julia Longfellow
published
Kathi Swagerty
published
Sarah van Rens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Gore + Loretta Lestrange6260% games−3.8% vs expected
Kathi Swagerty + Liz Coughlin213 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Gore + Elizabeth Gardner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laura Holt-Kabel
99W–44L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lynn Gore
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.91
Loretta Lestrange
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
Liz Coughlin
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
Margaret Massey
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.86
4
Betsy Kahn
6W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Elizabeth Gardner
130W–146L career · 12 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Terri Meier
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Julia Longfellow
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathi Swagerty
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah van Rens
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.