Teams

Serving You

2023 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince George's Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-09vs LoVV 2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoani Clay / Deborah Crite vs Tammie Wiley / Kelly Kennedy3-6, 2-6
2023-07-08vs Lady Acers 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesDeborah Crite / Joani Clay vs Theresa Henderson / Sara Perla6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJerrise Spencer vs Aklil Getachew1-6, 3-6
2023-07-01vs LoVV 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Fields / Joani Clay vs Tammie Wiley / Alexandria Davis6-4, 6-4
2023-06-25vs Lady Acers 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoani Clay / Deborah Crite vs Aklil Getachew / Myron James1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesApril Copes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Fields / Jerrise Spencer vs Maria Miller / Tosha Clark1-6, 6-7
2023-06-17vs Lady Acers 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesApril Copes / Deborah Crite vs Myron James / Theresa Henderson6-1, 6-1
2023-06-10vs LoVV 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesJoani Clay / Leslie Fields vs Tammie Wiley / Cynthia Ray7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJerrise Spencer / Keesha Blythe vs Alexandria Davis / Shanna Denbow2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince George's Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
April Copes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.82
Jerrise Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Natalie Walker
published
2.78
Joani Clay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Deborah Crite
published 3
2.65
Donna Pearson
published
2.55
Beverly Taylor
published 3
2.05
Kelly Garry Burks
published
Keesha Blythe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Copes + Joani Clay4173% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
April Copes
46W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Jerrise Spencer
48W–46L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Natalie Walker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Joani Clay
37W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Deborah Crite
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
Donna Pearson
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%15%85%
2.65
3
Beverly Taylor
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kelly Garry Burks
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Keesha Blythe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.