Teams

LLTC - Racquet Knights

2023 HTA Spring NA - Men's Doubles Thursday · 4.5 Men's Doubles

20 players · average NTRP 4.19 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Men's Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Billington Tong
published 4.5
4.26
Andy Chan
published 4.5
4.25
Trung Trinh
published
4.16
Phi Huynh
published
4.15
4.10
Lening Wang
published
4.09
Sean Hang
published
3.89
Israel Corona
published 4
3.86
Tuyen Nguyen
published
3.78
Dillon Piper
published 4
3.77
3.76
Stern Yeh
published
3.76
Kit Joseph Shum
published
Bryce Arvin
published 4
3.72
Ramana Surya
published
3.71
Dong Song
published 4
Justin Chang
published
Nicolas Grasty
published
Pablo Codesal
published
Tri Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kit Joseph Shum + Ramana Surya3545% games+2.2% vs expected
Kit Joseph Shum + Pablo Codesal4249% games+1.2% vs expected
Kit Joseph Shum + Eric Metcalf-Doetsch5159% gamesnot enough data
Billington Tong + Justin Chang134 matchesnot enough data
Trung Trinh + Kit Joseph Shum213 matchesnot enough data
Trung Trinh + Tri Pham123 matchesnot enough data
Giovanny Iabichino + Ramana Surya303 matchesnot enough data
Eric Metcalf-Doetsch + Billington Tong123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Billington Tong
42W–27L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Andy Chan
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
4.26
Trung Trinh
61W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
4.25
Phi Huynh
27W–39L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Eric Metcalf-Doetsch
52W–23L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
Lening Wang
80W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
4.10
Sean Hang
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Israel Corona
27W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
Tuyen Nguyen
33W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Dillon Piper
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Giovanny Iabichino
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Stern Yeh
40W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Kit Joseph Shum
37W–34L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Bryce Arvin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ramana Surya
37W–34L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Dong Song
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
Justin Chang
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicolas Grasty
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pablo Codesal
44W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tri Pham
23W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.