Teams

Moberg, Morgan

2024 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-26vs HOA/Vitha/18&Over3.5WLost 23
W#1 DoublesLisa Erickson / Mary Weaver vs Kari Lemons / Susan McConkey7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMorgan Moberg Moberg vs Emily Demarea2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPhoebe Davenport / Diane Strahl vs Alice Edwards / Susan Murphy6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLauren Surface vs Jennifer Haake0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Burnham / Laura Fosha vs Jennifer Schreiber / Erin Atherton1-6, 5-7
2024-06-19vs Bennett, ConnieLost 14
L#1 DoublesDiane Strahl / Laura Fosha vs Delane Cohen / Anne Miller1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Eichelberger vs Sheila Goins4-6, 5-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Weber / Kelly Burnham vs Ganga Perumparambil / Candace Herman7-6, 2-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHannah Thomazin vs Emily Skrobacz3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Spivak / Jennifer Benschoter vs Niorn Nicholas / Natalie Neal3-6, 1-6
2024-06-12vs Shapland, SuzanneWon 32
L#1 DoublesPhoebe Davenport / Laura Fosha vs Paula Flattery-Aaron / Susan Geick5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesHannah Thomazin vs Alli Hiatt5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Erickson / Maryanne Loscalzo vs Marti Huffman / Melinda McCalla1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMorgan Moberg Moberg vs Robin Rottinghaus6-7, 5-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Weaver / Pam Dunaway vs MaryAnn Luchtel / Marla Lovinggood6-2, 6-3
2024-05-29vs Hotze, EileenLost 23
W#1 DoublesDiane Strahl / Caitlin Tibbs vs Lori Blinn / Shauntae Morris6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRachel Eichelberger vs Katie Zoldak3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Weber / Pam Dunaway vs Eileen Hotze / Melissa Beltrame3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesPhoebe Davenport vs Tasha Kosanke6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKelly Burnham / Laura Fosha vs Natalie Hartman / Sheila Mccarrick1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-05-22vs Nelson, CydneyLost 23
W#1 DoublesHannah Thomazin / Lauren Surface vs Natalie Smith / Britton Briley7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRachel Eichelberger vs Ann McLiney6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Tibbs / Phoebe Davenport vs Angela Hagen / Kim Chappelow-Lee6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAlvynne Villacampa vs Angela Strohm4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPam Dunaway / Kelly Burnham vs Amy Jenkins / Nicole Satterwhite4-6, 3-6
2024-05-15vs Howes, IsaacLost 05
L#1 DoublesPhoebe Davenport / Natalie Weber vs Laura Cenedella / Carrie Davidson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRachel Eichelberger vs Ruth Ospino1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlvynne Villacampa / Diane Strahl vs Susan Schatz / Wendy Crowell4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHannah Thomazin vs Nancy MacK6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Surface / Jennifer Benschoter vs Nancy Huddlestun / Lindsey Klusman6-7, 4-6
2024-05-08vs Lyon, ShannonLost 23
W#1 DoublesMorgan Moberg Moberg / Phoebe Davenport vs Jennifer Barbier / Tracy Farnsworth6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Eichelberger vs Stephanie Stadlman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnn Spivak / Lisa Erickson vs Maria Andrew / Cassandra Schneeberger5-7, 6-6
L#2 SinglesAlvynne Villacampa vs Shannon Lyon6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Tibbs / Natalie Weber vs Kim Ulowetz / Shearon Nowak6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-05-01vs Robinson, MichelleLost 14
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Tibbs / Diane Strahl vs Nancy Brady / Michelle Robinson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlvynne Villacampa vs Relyn Strom3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Weber / Pam Dunaway vs Megan Bergquist / Rebecca Dick6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLauren Surface vs Patricia Noonan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMorgan Moberg Moberg / Mary Weaver vs HUIQUN MA / Jen O'Connor6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Phoebe Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.22
Rachel Eichelberger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Morgan Moberg Moberg
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.19
Alvynne Villacampa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Caitlin Tibbs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.14
Pam Dunaway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Diane Strahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.09
Hannah Thomazin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Kelly Burnham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Laura Fosha
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.75
Maryanne Loscalzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ann Spivak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Benschoter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Surface
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Natalie Weber
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Eichelberger + Phoebe Davenport5065% games+23.4% vs expected
Phoebe Davenport + Pam Dunaway4253% games+9.2% vs expected
Caitlin Tibbs + Natalie Weber2346% games+7.4% vs expected
Caitlin Tibbs + Alvynne Villacampa7261% games+7.0% vs expected
Mary Weaver + Pam Dunaway2450% games+5.0% vs expected
Laura Fosha + Diane Strahl7844% games+3.2% vs expected
Kelly Burnham + Pam Dunaway5550% games+2.6% vs expected
Caitlin Tibbs + Diane Strahl4452% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phoebe Davenport
74W–79L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Rachel Eichelberger
23W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Morgan Moberg Moberg
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Alvynne Villacampa
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Caitlin Tibbs
41W–36L career · 9 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
Pam Dunaway
47W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Diane Strahl
40W–42L career · 8 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Hannah Thomazin
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.09
Kelly Burnham
25W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Laura Fosha
22W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.91
Maryanne Loscalzo
28W–79L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Ann Spivak
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Benschoter
5W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Surface
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Erickson
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Weaver
23W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Weber
20W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.