Teams

Team Opponent

2023 Calvert Tri-Level 18 & Over · Calvert Tri-Level Women 4.0,3.5,3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-14vs Team BlairWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Staley / MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG vs Sara Vance / Ashly Blair6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNhi Phung / Tia Briscoe vs Rosalie Hooper / Kristina Lebron6-1, 6-4
2023-11-07vs Team BlairLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Louden / MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG vs Rosalie Hooper / Megan Gladwell2-6, 1-6
2023-11-02vs Team BlairSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristen Staley / Tia Briscoe vs Marissa Romanek / Brandie Sparr3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Arthur / MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG vs Ashly Blair / Lori Romanek6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-10-26vs Team BlairWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Staley / Tia Briscoe vs Marissa Romanek / Megan Gladwell6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatricia Louden / MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG vs Cindi Hodskins / Ashly Blair6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-24vs Team BlairLost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Lebow / Linda Rupard vs Trish Fulcher / Lori Romanek1-6, 3-6
2023-10-17vs Team BlairLost 01
L#2 DoublesNhi Phung / Linda Rupard vs Cindi Hodskins / Ashly Blair6-7, 3-6
2023-10-12vs Team BlairLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Arthur / Becky Lebow vs Trish Fulcher / Lori Romanek6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-10-05vs Team BlairWon 10
W#2 DoublesTia Briscoe / Linda Rupard vs Trish Fulcher / Lori Romanek7-5, 6-4
2023-10-03vs Team BlairLost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Lebow / Nhi Phung vs Kristina Lebron / Cindi Hodskins2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Tri-Level Women 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Susan Maier
published
3.60
Tia Briscoe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Jennifer Arthur
published
3.40
Nhi Phung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Patricia Louden
published
2.88
Becky Lebow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Linda Rupard
published
2.70
Catherine Wynne
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tia Briscoe + MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG8165% games+11.4% vs expected
Nhi Phung + Tia Briscoe303 matchesnot enough data
Nhi Phung + Becky Lebow033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Maier
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Tia Briscoe
286W–132L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jennifer Arthur
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Nhi Phung
88W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
137W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Patricia Louden
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Becky Lebow
36W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Linda Rupard
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
2.87
3
Catherine Wynne
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.