Teams

Taylor, Alyssa

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs Hodges, MarthaWon 21
W#1 DoublesHaiying Anne Chen / Megan Lyon vs Monique Kelly / Jennifer Tripoli6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaggie Wei / Kamryn Lantz vs Ali Webber / Cameron Martin6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMonique Holmes / Gwynn Cunningham vs Mandy Gardner / Martha Hodges3-6, 2-6
2026-08-20vs LeDuff, StacieWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Jones / Dorothy Graham vs Angie Keyes / Kim Sims6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHaiying Anne Chen / Christine Rice vs Laura Mccrory / Jean Tonnar-Seale6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGwynn Cunningham / Megan Lyon vs Amy Mayhue / Kellie Keyes6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Maggie Wei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Angela Yeatts
published 3.5
2.95
Dorothy Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Haiying Anne Chen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Christine Rice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Megan Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Claire Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Kamryn Lantz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Lisa Haynie
published
2.48
Alyssa Taylor
published 3
2.40
Lifang Yan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Monique Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Gwynn Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Lyon + Christine Rice3255% games−3.6% vs expected
Lisa Haynie + Megan Lyon2344% gamesnot enough data
Haiying Anne Chen + Lifang Yan134 matchesnot enough data
Haiying Anne Chen + Megan Lyon213 matchesnot enough data
Gwynn Cunningham + Megan Lyon303 matchesnot enough data
Gwynn Cunningham + Kamryn Lantz033 matchesnot enough data
Alyssa Taylor + Kamryn Lantz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Wei
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.06
3.5
Angela Yeatts
17W–16L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Dorothy Graham
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Haiying Anne Chen
23W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
3
Christine Rice
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Megan Lyon
26W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Claire Simmons
20W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Kamryn Lantz
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Lisa Haynie
15W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
3
Alyssa Taylor
14W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Lifang Yan
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Monique Holmes
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Gwynn Cunningham
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.