Teams

Las Posas Highballs

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

18 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-04vs WACtown GirlsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaureen Finnigan / Michelle Soto de Carvalho vs Mary Crossley / Lisa Weiss4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAimee Stotser vs Gina Vladimirov2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Nash / Felicula Tovar vs Robbie Knauer / Beth Esters3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatty Bolland / Riitta Andonian vs Cynthia Gorlitz / Shirley Gordon6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Sunset Hills Love AllSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaureen Finnigan / Felicula Tovar vs Karen Drake / Lori Galvin6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Hadler vs Aline Avila6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Nash / Janet Talmadge vs Susie Lundeen-smuck / Suzanne Plotkin1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Bolland / Teresa James vs Debbie Tuttle / Charlene Conklin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-22vs Las ConquistadorasLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaureen Finnigan / Susan Custance vs Mary Ann Fermin / Pamela Hellenbrand1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrenda Allison vs Teresa Amescua-Smith0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Nash / Gina Howey vs Katherine Weckhurst / Ana Cholo4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Talmadge / Keri Kettle vs Donna Ventura / Grace Ellerbrock2-6, 3-6
2026-02-22vs V-LLW Royal Court Jesters- MillerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBeverly Torres / Maureen Finnigan vs Lina Harandi / Wendy Crump1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKeri Kettle vs Jennifer Bishop0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Hadler / Felicula Tovar vs Manuela Aschacher / Anita Spraggs6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBetsy Willey / J Chen vs Kathryn Pisaro / Kelley Bannon4-6, 0-6
2026-02-15vs Valle Lindo VolleygirlsLost 13
L#1 DoublesGina Howey / Maureen Finnigan vs Jacqueline Francis / Pamela Wax-Semus6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJ Chen vs Judith Cade6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa James / Keri Kettle vs Debra Myrent / Stacy Ball0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Allison / Mary Kay Daniels- Yu vs Lucy Martin / Olivia Overton2-6, 4-6
2026-02-07vs Sunset AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Custance / Michelle Soto de Carvalho vs Nora Valentino / Heather Kawai1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Nash / Janet Talmadge vs Beatriz Rivera / Suzanne Hartz3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Allison / Patty Bolland vs Christin Field / Grace Lee0-6, 6-7
2026-01-31vs Pierpont BreakersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBeverly Torres / Gina Howey vs Pati Jurewicz / Julie McCaslin6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Hadler vs Diane Johnson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatty Bolland / Susan Custance vs Saudamini Sindhar / Karyn Teel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrenda Allison / Betsy Willey vs Mary Wiggins / Linda Manguiat-Herzog0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-01-25vs Power of LoveSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAimee Stotser / Beverly Torres vs Leilani O'Keeffe / Shannon Yanez6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Hadler vs Megha Agarwal6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeri Kettle / Susan Custance vs Natasha Gold / Tamara Campbell2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJ Chen / Mary Kay Daniels- Yu vs Asheley Mastronardi / Sara Sarti0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1V-LLW Royal Court Jesters- Miller8023921210
2Las Conquistadoras62221024230
3WACtown Girls62211127248
4Power of Love62191328260
5Sunset Aces35141838299
6Valle Lindo Volleygirls35131944319
7Pierpont Breakers26131943305
8Las Posas Highballs26112147305
9Sunset Hills Love All0882451342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Jamie Hadler
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Maureen Finnigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Beverly Torres
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.79
Michelle Soto de Carvalho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Gina Howey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Felicula Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Aimee Stotser
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Mary Nash
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.55
Janet Talmadge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Keri Kettle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.51
Susan Custance
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
J Chen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.49
Betsy Willey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Riitta Andonian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Teresa James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Mary Kay Daniels- Yu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Brenda Allison
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Torres + Gina Howey11852% games+5.2% vs expected
Maureen Finnigan + Beverly Torres5159% games+5.1% vs expected
Felicula Tovar + Mary Nash0539% games−13.4% vs expected
Riitta Andonian + Patty Bolland3444% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Finnigan + Gina Howey4156% gamesnot enough data
Janet Talmadge + Mary Nash033 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Stotser + Beverly Torres033 matchesnot enough data
Felicula Tovar + Maureen Finnigan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Hadler
20W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Maureen Finnigan
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Beverly Torres
34W–51L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Michelle Soto de Carvalho
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Felicula Tovar
32W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Aimee Stotser
2W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Keri Kettle
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
J Chen
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Betsy Willey
1W–10L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Riitta Andonian
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Teresa James
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Mary Kay Daniels- Yu
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
2.5
Brenda Allison
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.