Teams

LLAS UPTA18C/ Pandya/Holly Tree

18 & Over Combo · 9.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-26vs LCTA18/Elliget/I’OnLost 12
L#1 DoublesHarry Reed / Evan Greer vs Adam Elliget / Doug MacKelcan3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHunter Yarborough / Michael Brown vs Walker Long / Luke Kusmider6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesToby Rawlings / William Henderson vs James T Elliget / John Bumgarner6-3, 6-3
2025-10-26vs LATA18/Hunter/LCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Brown / Hunter Yarborough vs Nicholas Gaffos / Eric Hogue6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesToby Rawlings / William Henderson vs William Wiggins / Steven Junis6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEvan Greer / Scott Schmeissing vs Lane Hinson / Jordan Hunter3-6, 3-6
2025-10-25vs LLAS UPTA18C/Stewart/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesToby Rawlings / Hunter Yarborough vs John Wofford / William Mitchell6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHarry Reed / Michael Brown vs Timothy Stewart / Patrick Jopling6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesScott Schmeissing / Evan Greer vs John Jennings / Hamilton Russell3-6, 4-6
2025-10-25vs LCTA18/Smith/WDLost 03
L#1 DoublesHunter Yarborough / Evan Greer vs Stanley Waters / Parker Davis2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Brown / Scott Schmeissing vs Josh Smith / William Shelley4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesToby Rawlings / Brian Bartlett vs Donald Bruner / Dakota Greathouse1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hunter Yarborough
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.57
Evan Greer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
Harry Reed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Brian Bartlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Scott Schmeissing
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Raj Pandya
published
Nolan Marks
published
Toby Rawlings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hunter Yarborough + Brian Bartlett404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Hunter Yarborough
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Evan Greer
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.57
4.5
Harry Reed
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brian Bartlett
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
4.17
Scott Schmeissing
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
Raj Pandya
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Nolan Marks
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Toby Rawlings
10W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.