Teams

Tri Us

2024 Tri-Level League · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kimberly Arch
published
3.72
Mollie Garcia
published
3.69
Tina OBryan
published
3.68
Kathy Horton
published
3.48
Lilya Matos
published
3.39
Marina Henkes
published
3.24
Christi Palmer
published 3.5
3.23
Mary Cirilo
published
3.21
Lisa Chegin
published
3.14
Isabel Garcia
published 3.5
2.95
Jamie Johnson
published 3.5
Marisela Bateman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Cirilo + Marina Henkes2546% games−2.8% vs expected
Mollie Garcia + Tina OBryan314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Arch + Tina OBryan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Arch
18W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Mollie Garcia
19W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
Tina OBryan
26W–26L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Kathy Horton
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Lilya Matos
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
Marina Henkes
34W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Christi Palmer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Mary Cirilo
24W–81L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Lisa Chegin
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Isabel Garcia
4W–25L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jamie Johnson
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
Marisela Bateman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.