Teams

ORINDAWOODS 18AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-07vs Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.0BLost 13
L#1 DoublesEllie Kann / Lisa McGuinness vs Jeri Feuer / Euna Roh4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Martiniak vs Kristen Wong6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSally Fitzhugh / Kelly Kassela vs Sharon Gottlib / Mary Reese7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBetsy Gwynn / Gail Pearson vs Susan Aneja / Helen Yang3-6, 4-6
2025-05-18vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Simnett / Jillian Gee vs Amy Jiang / Betty Lee6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Pascale Siu
published
3.82
Sarah Martiniak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Amanda Makarevich
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Sally Fitzhugh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Lisa McGuinness
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Kelly Kassela
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Jillian Gee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Sally McKay
published
3.64
Mary Anjedani
published
3.58
Sandra Fox
published
3.53
Sarah Westphal
published
3.42
Jodie Dowling
published
3.35
Lee Gove
published
3.30
Gail Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Betsy Gwynn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ellie Kann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kay Sander
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa McGuinness + Sally McKay3550% games−8.7% vs expected
Kelly Kassela + Mary Anjedani134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pascale Siu
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Sarah Martiniak
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Amanda Makarevich
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Sally Fitzhugh
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Lisa McGuinness
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kelly Kassela
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Jillian Gee
27W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Sally McKay
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Mary Anjedani
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Sandra Fox
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Sarah Westphal
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Jodie Dowling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Lee Gove
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
Gail Pearson
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
3.5
Betsy Gwynn
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ellie Kann
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kay Sander
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.