Teams

Mediterra - Dooley

2025 Collier Adult 40 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-02vs Pelican Marsh - BradyLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Dooley / Elizabeth Lockey Kennedy vs Cathy Miles / Christine Brady2-6, 1-6
2024-11-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesMelony Petrovich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-11vs Heritage Bay - LesceWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelony Petrovich vs Cory Witters6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBendisa Miller / Rebecca Dooley vs Betty Axarides / Barbara Sidler6-3, 6-4
2024-11-04vs Vineyards -Won 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Dooley / Annette Jacobs vs Teri Solomon / Ann Luth6-4, 6-4
2024-10-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesMelony Petrovich vs Kimberly Martin6-4, 6-1
2024-10-21vs Fall Winners/Palmira - BullockWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelony Petrovich vs Crystal Schlanbusch6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Melony Petrovich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
2.89
Lisa Diiorio
published
2.84
Annette Jacobs
published 3
2.82
2.80
Tina Capraro
published
2.59
Mary Jo Sustar
published
2.58
Rebecca Dooley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Ella Kononenko
published
Megan Curran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jo Sustar + Annette Jacobs4354% games+18.5% vs expected
Mary Jo Sustar + Lisa Diiorio5850% games+2.6% vs expected
Rebecca Dooley + Annette Jacobs3347% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melony Petrovich
72W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Elizabeth Lockey Kennedy
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lisa Diiorio
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Annette Jacobs
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cathy Smith Papadellis
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Tina Capraro
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Mary Jo Sustar
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Rebecca Dooley
38W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Ella Kononenko
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Megan Curran
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.