Teams

GMurrell (Charlotte Tennis NC)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-18vs KPredmore (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Slep / Suzanne Roxburgh vs Kristine Predmore / Carol Prince1-6, 3-6
2025-03-28vs MDevendorf (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Roxburgh / Joan Slep vs Leslie Masucci / Susan Blackman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGillian Murrell / Toni Evans vs Margie Devendorf / Gunner Roza2-6, 3-6
2025-03-21vs MMcCreary (Matthews)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Slep / Karen Trigg vs Ellen Archer / Teresa Rhyne0-6, 1-6
2025-03-14vs JLayne (Southampton)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKate Blankenship / Gillian Murrell vs Shelly Steffey / Holli High2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Jane Bond vs Andrea Cossette / Colleen Schiavo7-6, 7-5
2025-03-07vs LSobodash (PLCC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesCindy Renk / Joan Slep vs Ashle Basden / Cyndi Thilo7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDianne Petrosino / Melodie Ohaus vs Cathy White / Laura Sobodash5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Suzanne Roxburgh
published
3.07
Jane Johnsen
published
3.06
Karen Trigg
published
3.04
Cindy Renk
published 3.5
3.01
Kate Blankenship
published
2.95
Toni Evans
published
2.95
Joan Slep
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Gillian Murrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Jane Bond
published
2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.82
Dianne Petrosino
published 3
Wilma Pinter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gillian Murrell + Joan Slep8550% games−7.9% vs expected
Dianne Petrosino + Wilma Pinter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Roxburgh
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jane Johnsen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Karen Trigg
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Cindy Renk
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kate Blankenship
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Toni Evans
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3.5
Joan Slep
50W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Gillian Murrell
49W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
Jane Bond
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Dianne Petrosino
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Wilma Pinter
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.