Teams

LATA40/Saleeby/SSP

2023 Combo 40 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 8.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Kaylin Hopkins
published
4.07
Kathryn Sandifer
published
4.04
Donna Saleeby
published
3.92
Dale Roberts
published 4
3.91
Staci Jackson
published
3.81
3.78
Theresa Stader
published
3.69
Sarah Zupon
published
3.68
Miranda Heaberlin
published
3.64
Sally Keiper
published
3.63
Lisa Dahlquist
published
3.63
Paula Howker Amick
published
Jill Sinegar
published
Kelly Haney
published
Kim Hill
published
Melanie Stuckrath
published
Michelle Haskell
published
Paula Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miranda Heaberlin + Melanie Stuckrath4169% games+13.3% vs expected
Kim Hill + Dale Roberts3252% games+3.7% vs expected
Staci Jackson + Kathryn Sandifer3254% gamesnot enough data
Kaylin Hopkins + Theresa Stader314 matchesnot enough data
Paula Nelson + Miranda Heaberlin224 matchesnot enough data
Staci Jackson + Sarah Zupon303 matchesnot enough data
Miranda Heaberlin + Theresa Stader123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaylin Hopkins
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.16
Kathryn Sandifer
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Donna Saleeby
31W–11L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Dale Roberts
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.92
Staci Jackson
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.91
4
Christina Kaye Huff
17W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Theresa Stader
46W–34L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Sarah Zupon
69W–56L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Miranda Heaberlin
85W–29L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Sally Keiper
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Lisa Dahlquist
60W–36L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Paula Howker Amick
53W–46L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Jill Sinegar
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Haney
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Hill
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Stuckrath
31W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Haskell
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Nelson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.