Teams

Goodwin Red's 40 4.0

2022 LAF Adult 40 & Over - Men · 4.0 LAF (40&O) Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 LAF (40&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Jonathan Goodwin
published
3.89
Ben Pok
published 4
Chris Rabeaux
published 4
3.68
Joseph Puhekker
published
3.61
Richard Rea
published
3.59
James Vining
published 4
3.47
Steven Greene
published
John Hendrick
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Goodwin
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Ben Pok
37W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Chris Rabeaux
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Puhekker
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Richard Rea
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
James Vining
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Steven Greene
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
John Hendrick
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.