Teams

Musgrove/LF

2022 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 8.0 MEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-27vs Soerries/PHWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Dean / Chris Thrutchley vs Scott Crane / Bill Buker7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChuck Clark / Bob Kolibas vs Edward Obana / James Wilkins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Pettingell / Monty Musgrove vs Ed Kranau / John Jennings6-1, 6-3
2022-06-07vs Nichols/PH 55s 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Dean / Joe Wilburn vs Ky Nichols / Bryan Hawkins6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBob Kolibas / Chuck Clark vs Kent Williams / Steven Henry6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTim Pettingell / Monty Musgrove vs Matthew Wollmershauser / Thomas Hunt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-16vs Rich/RH91Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Thrutchley / Robin Dean vs Bruce Thompson / Steve Byrd6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTim Pettingell / Monty Musgrove vs Byron Canfield / Cliff Vann6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKerry Haney / Bob Kolibas vs Jeff Lamoreaux / Matthew McBrien4-6, 1-6
2022-05-14vs Grewe/PHLost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Kolibas / Kerry Haney vs Mark Lehman / Marc Milsten1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMonty Musgrove / Tim Pettingell vs Marc Goldberg / Jose Contreras3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Dean / Chris Thrutchley vs Peter Tamura / David Wallis6-3, 7-5
2022-05-03vs Nichols/PH 55s 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKerry Haney / Monty Musgrove vs Jay Gulick / Jim Vanderveen6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChad McDermott / Chris Thrutchley vs Thomas Hunt / Ky Nichols6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTim Pettingell / Kevin Ronald Bass vs Kent Williams / Mark Cohlmia6-1, 6-2
2022-04-30vs TUL: Dollman/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Thrutchley / Chad McDermott vs Brian Jackson / Ronald Gordon6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKerry Haney / Jeff Finkenstaedt vs Russell Bell / Wayne Burnham7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Wilburn / Chuck Clark vs Scott Hjelm / Tom Roberts3-6, 1-6
2022-04-02vs Clonts/ISLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Ronald Bass / Tim Pettingell vs Lynn Fesperman / Scott Hartfelder3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChuck Clark / Kerry Haney vs Jeff Borgstrom / David Allen Clonts1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChris Thrutchley / Chad McDermott vs Rustin Garland / Dan McGovern6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TUL: Dollman/LF9123724236
2Grewe/PH63161124220
3Rich/RH9154131431238
4Musgrove/LF4314719193
5Clonts/IS46131736287
6Soerries/PH36111636261
7Nichols/PH 55s 8.001032757354

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Chris Thrutchley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.72
Tim Pettingell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Kerry Haney
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.42
Bob Kolibas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Chad McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Robin Dean
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.00
Chuck Clark
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jeff Finkenstaedt
published
Joe Wilburn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Monty Musgrove
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monty Musgrove + Tim Pettingell3256% games+7.2% vs expected
Monty Musgrove + Robin Dean6552% games+5.2% vs expected
Kerry Haney + Bob Kolibas3345% gamesnot enough data
Chad McDermott + Tim Pettingell5074% gamesnot enough data
Monty Musgrove + Chad McDermott134 matchesnot enough data
Chad McDermott + Robin Dean224 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Haney + Joe Wilburn213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Thrutchley + Chad McDermott303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Thrutchley
29W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
4.12
Tim Pettingell
85W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Kerry Haney
96W–55L career · 12 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Bob Kolibas
56W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Chad McDermott
98W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Robin Dean
80W–66L career · 9 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Chuck Clark
17W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
Jeff Finkenstaedt
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joe Wilburn
33W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monty Musgrove
63W–37L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.