Teams

Marco YMCA - Correa

2024 Collier Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-12vs Players Club - DaSilvaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodi Schaufus / Pattie Yergler vs Betty Hayes / Liz Wensley6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-12-11vs Naples Reserve - L. KeelyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Schaufus / Pattie Yergler vs Linda Keely / Linda Koole5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Correa / Pattie Yergler vs Nancy Schultz / Glenna Haas6-4, 6-1
2023-11-13vs Pelican Marsh/ Betty Boops/ KobelLost 01
L#1 DoublesPattie Yergler / Peggy Chandler vs Ilene Flack / Judy Kobel6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-11-06vs COLLIER /Howard/65&Over7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeggy Chandler / Pattie Yergler vs Judy Howell / Debbie Quitadamo6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Janet Reichhard
published
3.32
Karen Correa
published
3.30
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.28
Patricia Doyen
published
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Brita Swanson
published 3.5
3.12
Peggy Chandler
published
3.11
Sally Mattke
published
3.10
Jodi Schaufus
published
2.59
Claire Babrowski
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pattie Yergler + Karen Correa7749% games+2.8% vs expected
Patricia Doyen + Janet Reichhard6257% games+2.7% vs expected
Jodi Schaufus + Peggy Chandler3548% gamesnot enough data
Karen Correa + Deb Dorsey134 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Schaufus + Deb Dorsey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Reichhard
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Karen Correa
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Patricia Doyen
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Brita Swanson
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Peggy Chandler
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
Jodi Schaufus
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Claire Babrowski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.