Teams

Naples Grande - L Hindman

2022 Collier Adult 70 & over Winter · Adult 70 & over 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-01vs Naples Bay Resort - LevineWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren McGuire / Candia Barry vs Ricki Levine / Ellen Schmidt6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-25vs Naples Grande - N. BlackWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynne Lee Becker / Karen McGuire vs Shirley Scholl / Janice Hoeschler7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCandia Barry / Sarah Ford vs Nancy Black / Nancy Spiwak6-1, 6-1
2022-03-11vs Naples Bay Resort - LevineLost 01
L#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Karen McGuire vs Ricki Levine / Colleen Burns Keenan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-04vs Naples Grande - N. BlackSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCandia Barry / Linda Larkin vs Tina Gilmour / Karen Strand6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren McGuire / Patricia Preu vs Nancy Black / Hildy Glick3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-18vs Naples Bay Resort - LevineWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren McGuire / Candia Barry vs Minok Allen / Gail Hayton6-1, 6-3
2022-02-11vs Naples Grande - N. BlackLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren McGuire / Patricia Preu vs Nancy Black / Shirley Scholl1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-28vs Naples Bay Resort - LevineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren McGuire / Ann Manning vs Colleen Burns Keenan / Peggy Reynolds6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCandia Barry / Sarah Ford vs Minok Allen / Gail Hayton6-7, 5-7
2022-01-21vs Naples Grande - N. BlackWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoann Hogan / Candia Barry vs Nancy Black / Hildy Glick6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 70 & over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Candia Barry
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Ann Manning
published 4
Jackie Sawicki
published 4
Joann Hogan
published
Karen McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Linda Boyd
published
Sarah Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McGuire + Candia Barry5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Candia Barry
145W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Ann Manning
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jackie Sawicki
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joann Hogan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen McGuire
68W–34L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Boyd
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Ford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.