Teams

ABVanMeter (Southampton)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs MJones (Life Time)Split 11
L#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Michelle Davis vs Holly McClure / Tracey Loughlin-Young1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Patrice Forbes vs Leslie Masucci / Lea Powell6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2022-04-25vs TWalker (Carmel)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Teri Iezzi vs Sheri Sayman / Angie Michaud7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Jan Waller vs Wendi Brown / Susan Taylor6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-11vs WSolomon/Nichols (Carmel)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesChristine Barnes / Denise Bost vs Amanda Nichols / Maria Mascia4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Paige Golding vs Jill Halverstam / Whitney Smith2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-28vs KWainscott/McWilliams (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPauline Styers / Denise Bost vs Krista Wainscott / Christina McWilliams2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Paige Golding vs Deborah Toomey / Cindy McDowell3-6, 0-6
2022-03-21vs HBarney (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPauline Styers / Denise Bost vs Gina Gilchrist / April Greer7-5, 6-0
2022-03-07vs LAnderson (Brookhaven)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Pauline Styers vs Beth Flickinger / Cheryl Brooker0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Jan Waller vs Kelli Massaro / Kim Pizii6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Anne Polen vs Vanessa Pomfrey / Pattye Figman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-28vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Denise Bost vs Sheri Sayman / Dorian Dipangrazio6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Jan Waller vs Tamara Wise / Wendi Brown6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrice Forbes / Teri Iezzi vs Paige Reece / Mary Ruth Faulkner6-3, 6-2
2022-02-21vs MJones (Life Time)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Christine Barnes vs Emily Pease / Tiffany Kopittke6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Jan Waller vs Karen Schneider / Misty Jones6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Pauline Styers vs Kristy Simmons / Tracey Loughlin-Young7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Denise Bost
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Paige Golding
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Anne-Bee van Meter
published 3.5
3.17
Shelly Steffey
published
3.12
Teri Iezzi
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Pauline Styers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Patrice Forbes
published
2.94
Janet Layne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Iezzi + Denise Bost2548% games−10.7% vs expected
Shelly Steffey + Pauline Styers1532% gamesnot enough data
Paige Golding + Teri Iezzi1440% gamesnot enough data
Pauline Styers + Denise Bost3251% gamesnot enough data
Paige Golding + Pauline Styers213 matchesnot enough data
Patrice Forbes + Janet Layne123 matchesnot enough data
Patrice Forbes + Teri Iezzi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Bost
206W–139L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Paige Golding
74W–45L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Anne-Bee van Meter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Steffey
54W–40L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Teri Iezzi
110W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Pauline Styers
71W–92L career · 4 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Patrice Forbes
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
Janet Layne
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.