Teams

DIABLO CC 18MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX6.0

16 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesLindsay Walker / Christopher Pentes vs Jaclyn Rosete / Nilo Clava6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Parr / Jenee Rehrmann vs Kelly Lynch / Emma Hughes3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Rehrmann / Dana Brent vs Ellen Zapalac / Lou Salvador2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKelly Feinstein / Morgan Becker vs Nilo Clava / Christina Cordoza0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Hanks / Royce Paulsen vs Srini Parimi / Emma Hughes3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Forgham / Athena Yost vs Ellen Zapalac / Lou Salvador4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Lindsay Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Royce Paulsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Holly Hanks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Leslie Wuischpard
published
2.87
Kelly Feinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Jenee Rehrmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Erika Woolley
published
2.80
Sara Parr
published
2.79
Carla Forgham
published 3
2.77
Dana Brent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Dana Pingatore
published 3
2.71
Christopher Pentes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Richard Forgham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Morgan Becker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Bill Dodd
published 3
2.23
Athena Yost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Forgham + Richard Forgham314 matchesnot enough data
Dana Brent + Christopher Pentes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Walker
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Royce Paulsen
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Holly Hanks
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Leslie Wuischpard
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.88
Kelly Feinstein
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Jenee Rehrmann
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Erika Woolley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
Sara Parr
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
3
Carla Forgham
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dana Brent
14W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dana Pingatore
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Christopher Pentes
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Richard Forgham
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Morgan Becker
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Bill Dodd
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
2.5
Athena Yost
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.