Teams

Byrd-CC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall · Women 2.5 (No Advancement)

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-20vs Cochran/Sands-CCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Fleming / Jennifer Graham vs Diana Newman / Gloria Shayne3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Byrd / Jackie Tyo vs Ana Niknejad / Brenda Kosobucki6-2, 6-2
2024-11-08vs Cochran/Sands-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Diehl / Angela Byrd vs Diana Newman / Gloria Shayne2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeidre Hinson / Tina Lamb vs Brenda Kosobucki / Robin Sands2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Kraus / Jackie Tyo vs Karen Cochran / Cathy Robinson4-6, 4-6
2024-10-20vs Cochran/Sands-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesHallie Taylor / Jackie Tyo vs Gloria Shayne / Diana Newman4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Kraus / Tracie Nobles vs Donna Davis / Debra Kirksey6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracey Johnson / Kimberly Udy vs Brenda Kosobucki / Beverly Rumley6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 (No Advancement) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Tracie Nobles
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.48
Angela Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.40
Rebecca Fleming
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Suzanne Kraus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Jackie Tyo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.25
Hallie Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Kimberly Udy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Tina Lamb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Deidre Hinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.96
Amy Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Tracey Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidre Hinson + Tina Lamb2444% games−1.4% vs expected
Jackie Tyo + Suzanne Kraus044 matchesnot enough data
Deidre Hinson + Rebecca Fleming123 matchesnot enough data
Deidre Hinson + Hallie Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Angela Byrd + Hallie Taylor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracie Nobles
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Angela Byrd
48W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Rebecca Fleming
39W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
Suzanne Kraus
29W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Jackie Tyo
11W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Hallie Taylor
24W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Kimberly Udy
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Tina Lamb
4W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Deidre Hinson
8W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
2.5
Amy Diehl
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Tracey Johnson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.