Teams

TOC.Narula

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-22vs ACP.WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Grimm / JACKELYN MUNOZ vs Liza Terll / Meredith Bazemore3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Rodriguez / Victoria Helms vs Elischa Dessalines / Kaitlin Tucker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Revels / Kristina Narula vs Jessica Pearson / Katy McReynolds3-6, 1-6
2026-08-15vs ACP.WatsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Plunkett / Rebekah Swain vs Elaine Estes / Tami Stevens1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKristina Narula / Sarah Rodriguez vs Thatsinee Duvendack / Deicy Love2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSukanti Trimble / Victoria Helms vs Tatjana Gibson / Teresa Sothcott3-6, 3-6
2026-08-08vs MD.EnglertWon 21
W#1 DoublesJACKELYN MUNOZ / Sarah Rodriguez vs Kelly Shields / Jessica Tanaka6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Austin / Sue Mooney vs Lindsay Hopkins / Mary Ashley Hill4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVictoria Helms / Kristina Narula vs Beth Blake / Meredith Bayer1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Sarah Forman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Jessica Revels
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Anne Grimm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Sarah Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Katie Austin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Sukanti Trimble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Kristina Narula
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Victoria Helms
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.21
JACKELYN MUNOZ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Sue Mooney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Melissa Plunkett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebekah Swain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Forman
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Jessica Revels
58W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Anne Grimm
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Rodriguez
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Katie Austin
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Sukanti Trimble
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.35
Kristina Narula
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Victoria Helms
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
JACKELYN MUNOZ
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Sue Mooney
51W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Melissa Plunkett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rebekah Swain
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.