Teams

COASTSIDE TA/HALF MOON BAY HS CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-29vs SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW6.5BLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Freschi / Lucy Gillies vs Dana Gifford / Skylar Simpson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPeggy Seidel / Terry Sullivan vs Sehee Hong / Anna-liza Estoesta3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Wheeler / Mari Holcomb vs Minerva Gupta / Hemali Shah6-3, 7-5
2025-10-11vs SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW6.5CLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Pearlman / Tina Freschi vs Katja Gagen / Diane Martin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Sullivan / Annette Saunders vs Joni Fuse / Deepika Yelamanchi1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Economopoulos / Leslie Wakasa vs Carole Donnelly / Avis Lee3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Dea Parks
published 3.5
3.24
Anne Pearlman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Annette Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Kelly Huber
published
3.04
Andrea Gruner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Lucy Gillies
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Terry Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Leslie Wakasa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Nancy Economopoulos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Marty Mullarkey
published
2.79
Tina Freschi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Mari Holcomb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Letizia Pileggi
published
Margie L Gater
published
Mary Kay Jolley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Huber + Dea Parks134 matchesnot enough data
Mari Holcomb + Dea Parks213 matchesnot enough data
Mari Holcomb + Anne Pearlman123 matchesnot enough data
Annette Saunders + Terry Sullivan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dea Parks
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Anne Pearlman
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Annette Saunders
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kelly Huber
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Andrea Gruner
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Lucy Gillies
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Terry Sullivan
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
Leslie Wakasa
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Nancy Economopoulos
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Marty Mullarkey
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.81
Tina Freschi
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Mari Holcomb
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
Letizia Pileggi
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margie L Gater
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Kay Jolley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.