Teams

Beerman - G. Wood

2026 Polk Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.69 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-02vs Polk/EdwardsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Baird / Bettye Sykes vs Kim Knapp / Susan Jantomaso5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLizbeth Engle / Elizabeth Willers vs Rebecca Pate / Elizabeth Stevenson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGretchen Wood / Ann Marie Toney vs Jackie Edwards / Michelle Kilcher6-2, 6-3
2026-03-26vs Polk/EdwardsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Johnson / Kathy Borders vs Denise Saltman / Sonya Braudway2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Baird / Bettye Sykes vs Sharon Lockwood / Susan Jantomaso6-1, 6-3
2026-03-13vs Polk/EdwardsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Johnson / Bettye Sykes vs Elizabeth Stevenson / Susan Jantomaso3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Robinson / Ann Rainer vs Rebecca Pate / Nadine Pantano4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Marie Toney / Kathy Borders vs Denise Saltman / Sonya Braudway7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-05vs Polk/EdwardsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Baird / Gretchen Wood vs Kim Knapp / Nadine Pantano6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLizbeth Engle / Shelley Robinson vs Jackie Edwards / Michelle Kilcher6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Willers / Ann Rainer vs Rebecca Pate / Sharon Lockwood1-6, 3-6
2026-02-26vs Polk/EdwardsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Baird / Gretchen Wood vs Rebecca Pate / Michelle Kilcher6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Willers / Lizbeth Engle vs Jackie Edwards / Nadine Pantano7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Johnson / Tina Elortegui vs Denise Saltman / Elizabeth Stevenson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Gretchen Wood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Lizbeth Engle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Tina Elortegui
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Shelley Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Kathy Borders
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Ann Marie Toney
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Bettye Sykes
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.02
Elizabeth Willers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Ann Rainer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kathy Baird
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bettye Sykes + Ann Marie Toney5650% games−5.1% vs expected
Ann Rainer + Bettye Sykes3251% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Baird + Bettye Sykes314 matchesnot enough data
Lizbeth Engle + Ann Rainer033 matchesnot enough data
Lizbeth Engle + Bettye Sykes213 matchesnot enough data
Tina Elortegui + Shelley Robinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gretchen Wood
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
Lizbeth Engle
36W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Tina Elortegui
24W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Shelley Robinson
50W–107L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Kathy Borders
109W–75L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Ann Marie Toney
15W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Bettye Sykes
84W–81L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Willers
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Ann Rainer
63W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.95
Kathy Baird
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.