Teams

Yad/Kraska/Bettinger 4.0 40s

2024 Yadkin Valley Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women Monday morning

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-29vs Yadkin/Cannon/OT/40+4.0 DayWon 10
W#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Stephanie Bettinger vs Jennifer Baker / Margot Beach6-3, 7-5
2024-03-25vs Yadkin/FCC/40+4.0 DayWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Shawn McFarlin vs Beth Budd / Lucie Temple6-4, 6-2
2024-03-11vs Yadkin/Mays/HPCC/40+4.0 DayLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Shawn McFarlin vs Jill Bowman / Heather Parr7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Monday morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Marla Barnwell
published
3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.74
Catherine Tanner
published 4
3.72
Stephanie Bettinger
published
3.71
Carole Albright
published 4
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.64
Angela McGinn
published 4
3.60
Tammy Kasik
published
3.47
Elisabeth Kraska
published
3.31
Tammie Hughes
published
3.31
Laura Vary
published
3.25
Trisha Kirby
published
Susan Pardue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+1.5% vs expected
Catherine Tanner + Stephanie Bettinger4351% games−0.1% vs expected
Shawn McFarlin + Catherine Tanner3547% games−4.5% vs expected
Marla Barnwell + Sara Nundkumar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marla Barnwell
41W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Sara Nundkumar
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Catherine Tanner
40W–39L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Stephanie Bettinger
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carole Albright
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Angela McGinn
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Tammy Kasik
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Tammie Hughes
21W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Susan Pardue
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.