Teams

Wyndham Latief

2024 Richmond Combo Weekday · Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-07vs ACAC KastenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Eccard / Helen Wang vs Robin Griffith / Amy McGlynn6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCris Latief / Meigan Sullivan vs Kimberly Jones / Jane Parrish6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnna Gibellato / Becky Harper vs Jean Davis / Ali Silva6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-11-05vs TCRC ParrishWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaureen Mertz / Meigan Sullivan vs Donna Hall / Anne Hennessey6-2, 3-0
W#2 DoublesCris Latief / Becky Harper vs Beth Parrish / Pamela Hughes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKumiko Suzuki / Helen Wang vs Donna Boykin / Pam Berger6-1, 7-6
2024-10-31vs HCC TindelLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaureen Mertz / Meigan Sullivan vs Andrea Wassmer / Tracy Teal3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Eccard / Shazia Begin vs Lauren McKetta / Rita Ryan1-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs SCC Weisiger 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaureen Mertz / Meigan Sullivan vs Heather Benedetti / Colleen Weisiger2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Eccard / Helen Wang vs Sarah Boyd / Erin Garrett3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKumiko Suzuki / Gabriella Kaszala vs Stacey Gray / Carla Shaffer5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Gibellato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cris Latief
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Melanie Eccard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Meigan Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Kumiko Suzuki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gabriella Kaszala
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Becky Harper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Laureen Mertz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shazia Begin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meigan Sullivan + Laureen Mertz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Gibellato
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cris Latief
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Eccard
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Meigan Sullivan
21W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.12
Kumiko Suzuki
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Gabriella Kaszala
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Becky Harper
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Laureen Mertz
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shazia Begin
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.