Teams

Team B

Men's Non-Advancing League · 5.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-28vs Team AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarty Underwood / Eriksen Stropp vs Pawel Grzegrzolka / Colin Nardella6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLewis Carter / Matthew Funiciello vs Jeffrey Lonczak / Patrick O'Toole7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-21vs Team AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLewis Carter / Alexander McCarthy vs Pawel Grzegrzolka / Colin Nardella6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatthew Funiciello / JASON BARTON vs Joe Caiello / Patrick O'Toole7-6, 7-5
2025-09-13vs Team AWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mendler / Marty Underwood vs Pawel Grzegrzolka / Colin Nardella6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJASON BARTON / Eriksen Stropp vs Jeffrey Lonczak / Patrick O'Toole7-6, 7-6
2025-09-12vs Team AWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mendler / Marty Underwood vs Pawel Grzegrzolka / Joe Caiello6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJASON BARTON / Matthew Funiciello vs Patrick O'Toole / Jeffrey Lonczak6-4, 6-3
2025-09-11vs Team AWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mendler / Marty Underwood vs Joe Caiello / Pawel Grzegrzolka6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEriksen Stropp / Matthew Funiciello vs Jeffrey Lonczak / Patrick O'Toole6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
JASON BARTON
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Jonathan Bonnet
published
4.16
Alexander McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Eriksen Stropp
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Matthew Funiciello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Lewis Carter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marty Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Hatton
published
William Mendler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Mendler + Marty Underwood4172% games+30.3% vs expected
JASON BARTON + Alexander McCarthy7257% games+3.3% vs expected
Eriksen Stropp + JASON BARTON4153% games−5.9% vs expected
Eriksen Stropp + Matthew Funiciello213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
JASON BARTON
48W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
Jonathan Bonnet
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Alexander McCarthy
52W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Eriksen Stropp
51W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
Matthew Funiciello
23W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
Lewis Carter
37W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
Marty Underwood
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Hatton
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Mendler
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.