Teams

Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-04vs Hughes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Jill Fritz vs Yukari Matsuoka / Mary Batts6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Robinson / Toni Lewis vs Felicia Price / Kathryn Michaud6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Julie Spence vs Kathy Pace / Nancy McNeill6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Lee Varner vs Maggie Riley / Susan Parlier6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Sexton / Debbie Clancy vs Judy Thomas / Lisa Cook6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDeanna Rouse / Laura Vary vs Kim Hunt / Stacey Harris3-6, 3-6
2026-08-21vs Salata 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Spence / Toni Lewis vs Kimberly Salata / Maria Pincus6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Sexton / Elaine Fox vs Debbie Thomas / Allison Waddell6-2, 6-0
2026-08-14vs Barnes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Sexton / Lee Varner vs Shawn McFarlin / Kathy Brown6-2, 3-5
W#2 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Jill Fritz vs Lynn Guglielmo / Linda Lowman6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Robinson / Teresa Tolin vs Leah Price / Susan Payne6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-07vs Thornton 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartha Fogleman / Elaine Fox vs Janet Nicol / Mary Jane Tarver1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeanna Rouse / Jill Fritz vs Janis Beshears / Pamela Rosendale6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Teresa Tolin vs Jody Susong / Jane Davenport4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-31vs Hughes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Robinson / Toni Lewis vs Felicia Price / Mary Batts4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Lee Varner vs Pam McAmis / Kathryn Michaud7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeanna Rouse / Martha Fogleman vs Yukari Matsuoka / Tammie Hughes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.5 Women 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Majestic 55s 7.5 Combo Mon PM3081462
2Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM31841184
3Biaggi 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM2051657
4Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM2163667
5Hughes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM2154979
6Barnes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM21541183
7Thornton 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM12451074
8Chance 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM0103636
9Craig/Berreth 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM02151060
10Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM02151170
11Salata 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM0421020127

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Deanna Rouse
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Catherine Tanner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Karen Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Jill Fritz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Lee Varner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Julie Spence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Mary Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Debbie Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Martha Fogleman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Laura Vary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Katie Ballard
published
3.22
Elaine Fox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Teresa Tolin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Toni Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Ballard + Martha Fogleman4359% games+10.1% vs expected
Martha Fogleman + Toni Lewis2451% games+7.0% vs expected
Julie Spence + Debbie Clancy224 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Tolin + Karen Robinson123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Spence + Toni Lewis213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Fritz + Laura Vary213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Tanner + Toni Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Robinson + Toni Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deanna Rouse
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Catherine Tanner
41W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Karen Robinson
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Jill Fritz
51W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Lee Varner
45W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.50
Julie Spence
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Mary Sexton
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Debbie Clancy
32W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
Katie Ballard
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elaine Fox
113W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Teresa Tolin
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
Toni Lewis
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.