Teams

LA - Shadow's Aces

2022 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 8.0 Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-27vs LA - R0YAL FLUSHLost 01
L#1 DoublesShirley Fong / Tom Carter vs Tiffany Yuen / Alex Dongwon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-26vs LA-LLW-Fremont Aces-Rebekah LeeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShirley Fong / Daniel Kanemoto vs Tae Gim / Hyejung Oh6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Newhall / Brian Newhall vs Jason Nam / Mary Soto4-6, 6-7
2022-03-20vs LA - Group TherapyWon 20
W#2 DoublesShirley Fong / Daniel Kanemoto vs Sona Arutyunyan / Simon Chong6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Newhall / Brian Newhall vs Frances Murray / Oleksandr Ostrovskyi6-3, 6-4
2022-03-06vs LA - Beauties and the BeastsWon 10
W#3 DoublesShirley Fong / Daniel Kanemoto vs Aram Hamidi / David Li6-3, 6-0
2022-02-20vs LA - MountainGateLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Newhall / Brian Newhall vs Diana Carmichael / Ryan Chan1-6, 2-6
2022-02-06vs LA - Serves You RightLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Perry / Charles Perry vs Iris Cox / Gerald Blankson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-01-23vs LA - Sets on FireLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Newhall / Amy Newhall vs Joe Bolter / Lisa Paler2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 8.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Shirley Fong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Jenna Tempkin
published
4.08
Brian Newhall
published 4.5
3.87
Daniel Kanemoto
published 4
3.86
Stephanie Perry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Amy Newhall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
William Lucas
published
3.56
Charles Perry
published 4
3.46
Michelle Crossman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Perry + Amy Newhall8458% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shirley Fong
89W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
Jenna Tempkin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Brian Newhall
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Daniel Kanemoto
23W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Stephanie Perry
184W–106L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Amy Newhall
126W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
William Lucas
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Charles Perry
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Michelle Crossman
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.