Teams

Anthony/LR/CCLR

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-01-09vs Bledsoe/LR/PVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Howard vs Julie Miller6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Daniel vs Heidi Brandt3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-12-19vs Rutledge/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Howard vs Micah Shaver6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Daniel vs Abigail Obana6-0, 6-1
2024-12-03vs Herbert/Sheridan/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesMary Nell McBryde vs Amy Ross4-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAllison Anthony vs Karla Karwoski7-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesRachel Sims vs Marda Isbell1-6, 2-6
2024-11-21vs Laureano/NLR/BPWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Nell McBryde vs Florencia Bruzatori6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesGarrett Simpson Thalheimer vs Christi Callaway6-2, 6-3
2024-11-13vs Adkins/LR/PVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Nell McBryde vs Gracie Bailey1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAllison Anthony vs Abby Adkins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRachel Sims vs Lanie Driver1-6, 4-6
2024-11-07vs Virden/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 SinglesAllison Anthony vs Constance Lovelace6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRachel Sims vs Anne Virden6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesErin Baskin vs Brandilyn Morris6-3, 6-1
2024-11-05vs Miller/LR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesMary Nell McBryde vs Jasmine Black7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesErin Baskin vs Jennifer O Kelley7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesGarrett Simpson Thalheimer vs Madolyn Miller6-4, 6-2
2024-10-24vs Crowder/NLR/LakewoodSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Nell McBryde vs Leah Welker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRachel Sims vs Sarah Rech3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Allison Anthony
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.87
Suzanne Howard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.79
Elizabeth Daniel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.48
Mary Nell McBryde
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
Garrett Simpson Thalheimer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Rachel Sims
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Erin Baskin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Anthony
24W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
Suzanne Howard
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Elizabeth Daniel
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Mary Nell McBryde
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Garrett Simpson Thalheimer
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Sims
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23
Erin Baskin
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.