Teams

EFSC - Maratta

2024 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 4.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-23vs Suntree - GregoryLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne New / Naomi Coleman vs Jennifer Ledene / Lori Ewing4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie ODonnell vs Christina Carver6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLicci Barham / Sylvia Segura vs Margaret Staples / Amira Tolles3-6, 4-6
2023-12-09vs Florida/Wolszczak/18&Over4.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesStephanie ODonnell / Licci Barham vs Stacie Neff / Anna Butler5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBritta Barnby / Suzanne New vs Heather Schleicher / Rachel Weeks3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-19vs Suntree - GregoryLost 02
L#1 SinglesStephanie ODonnell vs Emerson McCleery5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLicci Barham / Britta Barnby vs Margaret Staples / Amira Tolles5-7, 1-6
2023-11-12vs Florida/Wolszczak/18&Over4.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLicci Barham / Naomi Coleman vs Missi DeMorat / Julie Wolszczak3-6, 2-6
2023-10-28vs Suntree - GregorySplit 11
W#2 DoublesLicci Barham / Nancy Sharp vs Carmal Lewis / Sandra Rowe6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrandi Maratta / Britta Barnby vs Amira Tolles / Margaret Staples0-6, 3-6
2023-10-21vs Florida/Wolszczak/18&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie ODonnell / Naomi Coleman vs Dawn Barlow / Carly Romanelli1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLicci Barham / Nancy Sharp vs Terry Taylor / Rima Campbell4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Stephanie ODonnell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Cristina Engel
published 4
3.65
Licci Barham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Naomi Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.31
Sylvia Segura
published
3.00
Britta Barnby
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Brandi Maratta
published 3.5
Suzanne New
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Licci Barham + Naomi Coleman221454% games+2.1% vs expected
Naomi Coleman + Stephanie ODonnell5945% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie ODonnell
50W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Cristina Engel
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Licci Barham
131W–81L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Naomi Coleman
170W–144L career · 3 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Sylvia Segura
18W–24L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Britta Barnby
28W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Brandi Maratta
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Suzanne New
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.