← Teams

CGM-Smiley/Ellingson

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Cheryl Geisler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jon Peters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Rolf Ellingsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.09
Steve Thunstedt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.53
Tamara Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
David Smiley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Mike Rebar vs Tony Kalil / Danielle Cuenco6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Steve Thunstedt vs Joy Meyers / Henry Kofron6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDonna Weyand / Jon Peters vs Fiona Tait / John Kin6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2018-11-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Mike Rebar vs Naomi Steinberg / Thor Deacon7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Pickering / David Smiley vs James King / Ellen Foley2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2018-10-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBarbara Pasmore / Steve Thunstedt vs Marianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Smiley / Tamara Phillips vs Douglas Brewer / Kathleen Budnick6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Pickering / Arvid Anderson vs Sarah Bradley / Chip Rosenfeld2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2018-10-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Brooke Henderson vs NANDA SIDDAIAH / Andrea Vicino6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMike Rebar / Vicki Blunt vs Dan Boren / Diana Blebea7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Heidi Kjos vs Rakesh Chirravuri / Cheri Martes Davis7-6, 6-4
2018-10-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Brooke Henderson vs Kim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVicki Blunt / David Smiley vs Jacqueline Wilcox / Lee Wilcox6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKaren Pickering / Mike Rebar vs Denise Dawkins / Mark Dawkins6-2, 7-5
2018-09-29Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Karen Pickering vs Tom Clemente / Jane Pinkowski2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJon Peters / Heidi Kjos vs James Prouty / Kate Kearney6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Smiley / Cheryl Geisler vs Corin Nies / Rachel Nies6-1, 6-4
2018-09-16Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesBrooke Henderson / Rolf Ellingsen vs Stephanie Jones / Jeffrey Bayless6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Jon Peters - * vs Kristin Eckelman / Glenn Eisen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Phillips / David Smiley vs Gretchen Wagner / Matthew Casimo6-4, 6-3
2018-09-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Donna Weyand vs Tony Moreno / Jian Xu6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVicki Blunt / David Smiley vs Shawn Boyce / Lyann Nguyen7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Geisler
124W–100L career
0%97%3%
3.39
3.5
Jon Peters
33W–36L career · type M
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Rolf Ellingsen
43W–38L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Steve Thunstedt
32W–46L career · type S
25%74%1%
3.09
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3
Tamara Phillips
66W–129L career
26%74%0%
2.53
0
David Smiley
19W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.