Teams

Lippy - Volley Llama 3.5 Singles

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-28vs Foehrkolb - Mishit Winners 3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesColin Lippy vs Daniel Tanay4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesColin Lippy vs Stephen Owen6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAlexander Sacker vs UMA SRIKUMARAN3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMATTHEW HEINRICHS vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-04vs Sesin - Baseline ResistanceLost 02
L#1 SinglesColin Lippy vs Erik Avant2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMATTHEW HEINRICHS vs Michael Punsalan4-6, 6-7
2025-10-01vs Ghim - Steely Vanguard-SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesColin Lippy vs Fengji Zhang1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAlexander Sacker vs Christopher Reger1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMATTHEW HEINRICHS vs Edward Adutwum2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-21vs Munshell - IHT 18 1XLost 02
L#1 SinglesColin Lippy vs Alexander Theoharis3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAlexander Sacker vs Brian Kennedy4-6, 4-6
2025-09-13vs Sesin - Baseline ResistanceWon 10
W#1 SinglesColin Lippy vs Erik Avant6-4, 7-5
L#3 SinglesAlexander Sacker vs Edward Adutwum2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Adam Drucker
published 3.5
3.36
David Starsoneck
published 3.5
3.34
Kurt Uttenreither
published
3.25
MATTHEW HEINRICHS
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Colin Lippy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Milan Paudel
published
3.17
Alexander Sacker
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Sandeep Das
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Starsoneck + Kurt Uttenreither213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Drucker
10W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
David Starsoneck
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Kurt Uttenreither
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
MATTHEW HEINRICHS
87W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Colin Lippy
80W–94L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Milan Paudel
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Alexander Sacker
114W–93L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Sandeep Das
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.