Teams

Apex:TBD:Deeley

2023 ME Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule18 played
2023-06-11vs MP:MPAces:WalekWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Karen Phillips vs Erin James / Kate Willeford7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLucy Leighton / Eileen Spencer vs Kathleen Kurjanowicz / Vicky Packard6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Angela MacWhinnie1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Julian / Maureen Lucey vs Marcella Estes / Lindy Ost6-1, 6-2
2023-06-10vs WOOD:WhataRacket:NewkirkLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanne Julian / Eileen Spencer vs Elise Furey / Monica Sanders1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristiana Kroondyk vs Camille Nelson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Lucy Leighton vs Joanna Yu / Nicole Gauthier1-6, 3-6
2023-06-04vs WOOD:WhataRacket:NewkirkWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Wen Wang vs Kelley Newkirk / Joanna Yu6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEileen Spencer vs Kathryn Brouillette4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeanne Julian / Christiana Kroondyk vs Monica Sanders / Joy Hwang6-4, 7-6
2023-06-04vs MP:EverlastingLobstoppers:RobinsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesWen Wang / Christiana Kroondyk vs Vicky Packard / Gina Tansey6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Alice Carleton2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChloe Howe / Jeanne Julian vs Heather LaPointe / Kathleen Kurjanowicz4-6, 4-6
2023-06-03Lost 01
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Camille Nelson1-6, 2-6
2023-06-03vs Apex:Topspinistas:CrosbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesRita Farry / Elizabeth Deeley vs Andrea Otis-Higgins / Patricia Martel-Buxton0-6, 1-6
2023-05-21vs CLC:NetAssets:StevensonLost 01
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Sarah Whitfield1-6, 4-6
2023-05-21vs MRC:TBD:RoperLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Kendrick / Elizabeth Deeley vs Shelley Pease / Tonya Holt3-6, 2-6
2023-05-20vs WOOD:WhataRacket:NewkirkLost 03
L#1 DoublesLucy Leighton / Wen Wang vs Christina Copsey / Jane Camp2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Kelly Fleming3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Spencer / Chloe Howe vs Molly Meyer / Monica Sanders6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-20vs MP:EverlastingLobstoppers:RobinsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLucy Leighton / Eileen Spencer vs Alice Carleton / Heather LaPointe4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Wen Wang vs Karin Tuuri / Lindy Ost6-3, 6-3
2023-05-07vs WOOD:Woodlands:BryantWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Rebecca Woodcock vs Mary Reany / Jennifer Alcock6-2, 6-2
2023-05-07vs MRC:TBD:RoperLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Rebecca Woodcock vs Elizabeth O'Connor / Cindy Behling1-6, 0-6
2023-04-30vs Apex:Topspinistas:CrosbyLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Woodcock / Elizabeth Deeley vs Christiana Kroondyk / Ruth Crosby2-6, 0-6
2023-04-30vs CLC:NetAssets:StevensonLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Karen Phillips vs Laurie Green / Kathleen Kurjanowicz5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLucy Leighton / Maureen Lucey vs Elaine Bell / Lindy Ost6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Deeley vs Karin Tuuri4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWen Wang / Christiana Kroondyk vs Janice Robinson / Alison Hinson6-1, 6-3
2023-04-29vs WOOD:WhataRacket:NewkirkLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Spencer / Chloe Howe vs Christina Copsey / Jane Camp2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWen Wang vs Kelly Fleming1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Julian / Maureen Lucey vs Lindsay Roskelley / Elise Furey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Phillips / Elizabeth Deeley vs Erin James / Carla Dickstein6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:Topspinistas:Crosby82351539392
2MP:MPAces:Walek73311941377
3CLC:NetAssets:Stevenson37173372523
4Apex:TBD:Deeley19153573504

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Christiana Kroondyk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Maureen Lucey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Wen Wang
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.48
Elizabeth Deeley
usually #1 Singles 24%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Chloe Howe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Lucy Leighton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Eileen Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wen Wang + Christiana Kroondyk404 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Leighton + Maureen Lucey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christiana Kroondyk
33W–8L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Maureen Lucey
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Wen Wang
78W–45L career · 10 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Elizabeth Deeley
16W–66L career · 15 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Chloe Howe
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lucy Leighton
24W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.23
Eileen Spencer
3W–14L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.