Teams

Fred Wells Pacheco 10:30 am

2025 Woman's Daytime Singles · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-12vs Fred Wells Sollenberger 10:30amWon 42
W#1 SinglesTaia Morley vs Dina Wolkoff7-6, 3-3
W#2 SinglesWinnie Lynott vs Sarah Muellenberg7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJennifer Wenck vs Paula Bach6-3, 6-0
L#4 SinglesSuzanne Hermes vs Angela Lockhart2-6, 4-5
W#5 SinglesMarsha Fosburgh vs Susan Volin6-4, 3-4
L#6 SinglesHannah Hebl vs Tisha Colton2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
3.44
Winnie Lynott
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Taia Morley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Jennifer Wenck
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Sarah Muellenberg
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Dina Wolkoff
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Marsha Fosburgh
usually #5 Singles 100% · published
3.08
Suzanne Hermes
usually #4 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Nancy Garrett
published
2.97
Paula Bach
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Sylvia Frank
published
2.77
Wendi Kelly
published
Hannah Hebl
usually #6 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Winnie Lynott + Taia Morley9557% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Lukehart-Hobbs
27W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Winnie Lynott
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Taia Morley
24W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Jennifer Wenck
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sarah Muellenberg
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Dina Wolkoff
26W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Marsha Fosburgh
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Suzanne Hermes
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Nancy Garrett
36W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Paula Bach
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sylvia Frank
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Wendi Kelly
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Hannah Hebl
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.