Teams

Va.Fleischmann55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVanessa Fleischmann / Theresa Perlowski vs Angela Hunter / Liza Gettles0-6, 1-6
2024-04-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Perlowski / Sierra Luz vs Cathy Couch / Joy Cooper2-6, 1-6
2024-04-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVickie Dagit / Lynn Longest vs Sara May / Kim Royal3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-04vs Ro.Ziperski55ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesVickie Dagit / Karen Wahle vs DEBRA LAUGHERY / Jeanne Stallings4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Blume / Lavonne Moore vs Helen Velk / Lori Harrelson6-2, 6-0
2024-03-21vs We.Sielaty55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesTheresa Perlowski / Lynn Longest vs Jade Paunovich / Julie Shuey1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLavonne Moore / Karen Blume vs Dawn Rusnak / Karen Rayda3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-14vs Di.Williams55A3.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesVickie Dagit / Lynn Longest vs Jorgelina Stroud / Susan Starnes2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Perlowski / Kathryn Williamson vs Tina Parker / Jeannette Congdon2-6, 1-6
2024-02-29vs Ka.Serow55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesTheresa Perlowski / Maria Riemann vs Carol Zimmerman / Thelma Bicksler2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Karen Blume
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Judy Colby
published
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Lavonne Moore
published
2.48
Theresa Perlowski
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.44
Lynn Longest
published
2.42
Sally Sikes
published
2.35
Kathryn Williamson
published
2.00
Terry Marcott
published
Ellen Werner
published
Maria Riemann
published
Sierra Luz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vickie Dagit + Karen Blume224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Blume
42W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Judy Colby
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Vickie Dagit
28W–96L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lavonne Moore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Theresa Perlowski
18W–51L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Lynn Longest
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.44
Sally Sikes
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.42
Kathryn Williamson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.35
Terry Marcott
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Ellen Werner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sierra Luz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.