Teams

MHolt-HS

2025 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15vs GGlish-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / David Holub vs JOE BERTON / Bob Stocking3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhilip Sweigart / Ed Holub vs Scott Beddingfield / Timothy Buckley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Michael Holt vs Wendell Gilland / Gary Glish4-6, 2-6
2025-10-11vs NBuckley-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / David Holub vs William Lillard / Chris Sansone6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSiming Mu / Philip Sweigart vs Greg Matera / Greg Duncan6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBill Gentry / Valdis Stiebris vs John Lockhead / Gregory Schulwitz3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-01vs NBuckley-HRWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Holub / Phil Korest vs David Grose / William Lillard3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBill Gentry / Philip Sweigart vs Bart Cleary / Chris Sansone6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSiming Mu / Valdis Stiebris vs Michael Spears / Niall Buckley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-24vs GGlish-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhil Korest / David Holub vs Sudhanshu Handa / Gary Glish6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Lindblom / Ed Holub vs James Orleans / Bob Stocking6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Reedy / Vincent Illiano vs Scott Beddingfield / Randy Cubrilovic2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-11vs GGlish-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Vincent Illiano vs Sudhanshu Handa / Bob Stocking1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Stone / Philip Sweigart vs Scott Beddingfield / Randy Cubrilovic7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSiming Mu / Ed Holub vs Wendell Gilland / Doug Kopec7-5, 6-2
2025-09-10vs NBuckley-HRLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhil Korest / Ed Holub vs William Lillard / Chris Roessler3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Stone / Philip Sweigart vs Michael Spears / Greg Duncan6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Reedy / Valdis Stiebris vs Bart Cleary / Lance Long3-6, 5-7
2025-08-20vs NBuckley-HRLost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Gentry / Philip Sweigart vs William Lillard / Chris Roessler6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Stone / Vincent Illiano vs Greg Matera / Lance Long6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Reedy / Valdis Stiebris vs Michael Spears / Greg Duncan4-6, 2-6
2025-08-13vs GGlish-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPhil Korest / Vincent Illiano vs JOE BERTON / Doug Kopec3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Stone / Michael Holt vs Wendell Gilland / Randy Cubrilovic3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Reedy / Stephen Rothchild vs Scott Beddingfield / Gary Glish4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GGlish-CHTC7116822209
2NBuckley-HR3591534250
3MHolt-HS26111330217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Eric Lindblom
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Jeff Reedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Philip Sweigart
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.57
Phil Korest
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.49
Ed Holub
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Michael Holt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
David Holub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Vincent Illiano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Stephen Rothchild
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Valdis Stiebris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bill Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Siming Mu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Holub + David Holub5166% games+11.5% vs expected
Philip Sweigart + Phil Korest2838% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Reedy + Phil Korest4162% gamesnot enough data
Ed Holub + Stephen Rothchild314 matchesnot enough data
Philip Sweigart + Jeff Reedy213 matchesnot enough data
Philip Sweigart + Stephen Rothchild123 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Reedy + Stephen Rothchild213 matchesnot enough data
Phil Korest + David Holub123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Lindblom
122W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Jeff Reedy
62W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Philip Sweigart
64W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
4
Phil Korest
43W–41L career · 7 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ed Holub
78W–28L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Michael Holt
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
David Holub
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Vincent Illiano
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Stephen Rothchild
62W–60L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Valdis Stiebris
57W–72L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Bill Gentry
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Siming Mu
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.