Teams

HHTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Thomas)

Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Men 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-09vs HHTL18/Tolley/Spring LakeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesWes Walker / Christian Cole vs Scott Jennings / Randy Marcotte6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesPaul Halloran vs Brad Dershaw6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGeorge Knoske / Greg DeLoach vs Pete Carson / Kevin Thieneman3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Kehres vs Brian Tolley2-2
2026-04-02vs HHTL18/Tolley/Spring LakeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJack Abernathy / Paul Halloran vs Scott Jennings / Kevin Thieneman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoseph Naples vs Brian Tolley6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg DeLoach / Christian Cole vs Brad Dershaw / Randy Marcotte4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-23vs HHTL18/Tolley/Spring LakeWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Halloran / Christopher Bisgard vs Brad Dershaw / Kevin Thieneman4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristian Cole / Greg Vickrey vs Pete Carson / Randy Marcotte6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJoseph Naples vs Ken Kolbe6-1, 6-4
2026-03-18vs HHTL18/Tolley/Spring LakeWon 31
W#1 DoublesDrew Seale / Craig Warner vs Kevin Thieneman / Joe Short2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWes Walker vs Brad Dershaw6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesPaul Halloran vs Brian Tolley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Thomas / Brian Fedorick vs Kent Charter / Scott Jennings6-0, 6-3
2026-03-08vs HHTL18/Tolley/Spring LakeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesWes Walker / JOHANNES ZACHBAUER vs Pete Carson / Kevin Thieneman7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrian Fedorick vs Randy Marcotte1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGreg DeLoach / Brian Thomas vs Ken Kolbe / Brad Dershaw6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJoseph Naples vs Brian Tolley6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-22vs HHTL18/Tolley/Spring LakeLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrian Fedorick / David Hock vs Scott Geist / Joe Short7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJOHANNES ZACHBAUER vs Brian Tolley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Thomas / Craig Warner vs Ken Kolbe / Randy Marcotte5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJack Abernathy vs Pete Carson0-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HHTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Thomas)42171329203
2HHTL18/Tolley/Spring Lake24131741286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
David Kehres
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Christian Cole
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Greg Vickrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Wes Walker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.40
George Knoske
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Joseph Naples
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Brian Fedorick
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Craig Warner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Greg DeLoach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jack Abernathy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.14
Patrick Cummings
published
3.10
JOHANNES ZACHBAUER
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.09
Paul Halloran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.08
Christopher Bisgard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
David Hock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Drew Seale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Vogel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Kehres + Christian Cole5166% gamesnot enough data
Greg Vickrey + Christian Cole303 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Bisgard + Patrick Cummings213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Kehres
29W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Christian Cole
38W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Greg Vickrey
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Wes Walker
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
George Knoske
23W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Joseph Naples
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Brian Fedorick
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Craig Warner
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Greg DeLoach
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Jack Abernathy
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Patrick Cummings
17W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
JOHANNES ZACHBAUER
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Paul Halloran
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Christopher Bisgard
32W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
David Hock
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Drew Seale
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.79
Scott Vogel
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.