Teams

Olympus Hills-Sargant

2022 Adult USTA 18-39 League · 9.0W

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Olympus Hills-Parry43111023181
2Olympus Hills-Sargant34101127197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Ashley Tanner
published 5
4.46
Laura Savage
published
Celia Dunn
published 4.5
4.11
Kara Sargent
usually #1 Female Doubles 33%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Victoria Lara
published
4.02
Ellie Flowers
published 4.5
3.97
Olivia Hu
published
3.85
Alexandria Keith
published 4.5
Anne Young
published 4
3.72
Megan Connelly
published
Rebecca Russell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Lara + Laura Savage314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Savage + Kara Sargent303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ashley Tanner
43W–45L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.64
Laura Savage
116W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.46
4.5
Celia Dunn
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Kara Sargent
56W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
Victoria Lara
59W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
4.11
4.5
Ellie Flowers
29W–30L career · type S · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4.5
Alexandria Keith
49W–52L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
Anne Young
11W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Connelly
46W–46L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Rebecca Russell
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.