Teams

1 Willow Oaks Curdts

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-12Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKelly Stalls vs Laura Williams1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-11-08vs 6 CCV DeLaceySplit 11
L#2 SinglesAnne Elles vs Mary Beth Scott3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Laura West Hatcher6-3, 6-4
2025-11-02vs 4 MAC ScottLost 01
L#3 SinglesAnne Elles vs Crystal Gibson4-6, 2-6
2025-10-22vs 2 ACAC MorganWon 21
W#1 SinglesGena Burr vs Kate Zachry6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKelly Stalls vs Katie Vasconcelos4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Andrea Morrow5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-18vs 6 CCV DeLaceyWon 21
L#1 SinglesKelly Stalls vs Megan Hodges2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGena Burr vs Kerry DeLacey6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hale vs Alexandra Huffman6-4, 6-3
2025-10-10vs 5 KRA TurnerSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKelly Stalls vs Katie Intihar6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesIngrid Hale vs Katherine Czyszczon6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-06vs 4 MAC ScottLost 12
L#1 SinglesKelly Stalls vs Katherine McDowell1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Rebecca Haener1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesGena Burr vs Katie Hambrick6-3, 6-1
2025-10-01vs 2 ACAC MorganLost 02
L#2 SinglesKelly Stalls vs Julie Ruth7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesGena Burr vs Kristen Walton6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Peyton Curdts
published
3.88
Gena Burr
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.86
Anne Elles
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.79
Jennifer Smith
published
3.73
Kelly Stalls
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.69
Rebecca Hendrix
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.55
Ingrid Hale
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Stalls + Anne Elles241556% games+6.0% vs expected
Anne Elles + Gena Burr4550% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Stalls + Jennifer Smith134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peyton Curdts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Gena Burr
114W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Anne Elles
146W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Jennifer Smith
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Kelly Stalls
146W–144L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Rebecca Hendrix
49W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Ingrid Hale
88W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.