Teams

LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD SPARTAN 7.5

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

15 players · average NTRP 3.61 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Jennifer Higgins
Sep 21 6:30 PM
vs LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +
Julie Finke
Sep 28 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Nicole KaytonMali Robinson
Oct 5 6:30 PM
Skybrook Swim and Racquet Club
Oct 12 6:30 PM
Leila RiccardelliBridgett Dedmond
Oct 19 6:30 PM
Bailey Road Park Tennis Court Complex
2026-08-31vs LKLR-Riccardelli/WestportWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Novak / Dawn Bush vs Jill Sullivan-Keating / Diane Davis3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Modlin / Michelle Potuzak vs Danielle Curwood / Helen Bugg6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaggie Strevell / Millie Harrington vs Denise Bost / Nathalie Naslund6-2, 7-6
2026-08-24vs LJRO-Rode/SkybrookLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaggie Strevell / Janet Novak vs Stephanie Campbell / Suzette Watson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Bain / Michelle Potuzak vs Patricia Baldelli / Katherine Dugan6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLauren Herrmann / Millie Harrington vs Amy Barnett / Shumbriar Ostapko6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-10vs LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Novak / Mali Robinson vs Michelle Skaggs / Leah Rand7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichelle Potuzak / Nicole Kayton vs Stefanie Flippin / Megan Hartley3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Buaron / Maggie Strevell vs MaryGwen Murash / Julie Finke2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSCL-Clancy/CRP2042544
2LJJO-Joiner/NMP2051548
3LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +2042551
4LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport1021317
5LWKI-King/CSD1142444
6LJHI-Higgins/Bailey1142761
7LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSC1133861
8LMKPO-Portaro/Jetton1133859
9LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/Peninsula1124861
10LAMC-McRorie-Dudan/Jetton0112427
11LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD SPARTAN 7.50112435
12LNCH-Cheatham/PAC0103638
13LCAP-Aprile/RR0224966
14LJRO-Rode/Skybrook02151165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Michelle Potuzak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Janet Novak
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Jessica Carilli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Millie Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Nadia Cc
published
3.49
Lee Ann Ahern
published 3.5
3.45
Maggie Strevell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Ann Modlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Dawn Bush
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Kathy Buaron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Heather Bain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Mali Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Astrid Peterson
published 3.5
3.21
Lauren Herrmann
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Nicole Kayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Astrid Peterson + Mali Robinson203445% games−0.2% vs expected
Astrid Peterson + Heather Bain2448% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Strevell + Kathy Buaron2447% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Herrmann + Mali Robinson134 matchesnot enough data
Millie Harrington + Maggie Strevell123 matchesnot enough data
Millie Harrington + Lauren Herrmann033 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Potuzak + Nicole Kayton123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Bain + Nicole Kayton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Potuzak
150W–116L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Janet Novak
30W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Jessica Carilli
85W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.62
4
Millie Harrington
11W–22L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Nadia Cc
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Lee Ann Ahern
88W–66L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Maggie Strevell
36W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Ann Modlin
80W–135L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Dawn Bush
50W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Kathy Buaron
182W–148L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Heather Bain
156W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Mali Robinson
80W–115L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Astrid Peterson
105W–86L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Lauren Herrmann
154W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Nicole Kayton
60W–78L career · 1 line in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.